That if mueller brings criminal charges to the table they will most certainly impeach. That is what Congress is supposed to do. No reason to commit to impeachment before charges are brought

Democrats would not want to impeach if there is no evidence. What is the possibility of that?

And Republicans would not want to defend Trump if there are serious criminal charges involved. That is some pretty shaky ground also.

Until the evidence is in the public domain, it is best to keep your cards close to your vest.

The Democrats walk a fine line between the esposure of the depth of corruption of the administration, and being angry without being the lynch mob.

Pelosi and schummer are being smart like a fox...if asked, they never more than casually reply, almost as disinterested

Then they might have a chance.

Hillary Clinton, whatever her flaws were last time, won the popular vote by 3 million, even with the help of Russia, various acts of skulduggery, and after the GOP and Trump had worked their base into a veritable frenzy of (pseudo) Pro-America, xenophobic, coal-rollin' fury.

With all that has transpired since Trump's election, the vast, vast majority of it bad, insane, anti-American, corrupt, anti-Christian*, etc., I can't see how a Democratic challenger would not do even better than Hillary. This has been a disaster for the country that will take decades to repair. I think more people get that now, though had they thought objectively for more than a millisecond, should have been rightly able to imagine such a scenario before the election. But, nevertheless, here we are, and we have to keep the pressure on to get Trump and the GOP Tea Party ilk out of and away from power for many election cycles.

And don't count on the Republican House or Senate to do ANYTHING regarding impeachment. There has been more than enough evidence of a mountain of serious ethical and criminal activity, and they've basically given no more than lip service to the whole affair. Also, don't forget how the Republican Senate stalled Merrick Garland's SC nomination, and later installed nutcase Neil Gorsuch. They have no problem going as low as possible, and just when you think they can't go any lower, they find an undiscovered avenue to plumb the depths further.

those 20-30 something-ers who didn't vote. It would give them something other than they didn't want - Cheetolini or the Democratic candidate.

I think Trump is toxic enough that we should turn this around and wave the banner of being the Law And Order Party. When Mueller brings his indictments we should promice America that our Representatives will do their jobs in Congress and uphold the laws of the land and Impeach.

We should flip this on them.

I think we should wait to see what Mueller has on Trump before we initiate it.

Wish he could speed it up.

It may satisfy opposition but it's not going to motivate or win hearts and minds of infrequent voters. The people who are invested in impeachment as an end game are a vocal minority.
It's worth remembering that our side dug in to support Clinton. I think we even picked up seats in '98 midterms.

Republicans kept majority in both.

I hope our candidates and supporters will keep their eyes on the prize. We can't afford to blow this opportunity to elect more Democrats.

why throw red meat to their base???

Let GOP keep ahold of trump and bring up impeachment and if/when mueller starts bringing more indictments against trump's inner circle and perhaps trump himself...let the GOP keep defending the indefensible. But as democrats we should say we are "about the rule of law"

and leave it at that

The republicans are looking for any message they can fine to stir up the base to go out and vote.
It is not surprising they would use this as a strategy

Accountable