Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTwitter video of Wendy Vitter trying to explain why she pushed pamphlet, "The Pill kills"
Last edited Sat Apr 14, 2018, 10:06 AM - Edit history (1)
which states that the pill would lead more women to have extramarital affairs and "More likely you will die a violent death"
(I don't know how to post videos from Twitter that will show up here)
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 1157 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Twitter video of Wendy Vitter trying to explain why she pushed pamphlet, "The Pill kills" (Original Post)
Maraya1969
Apr 2018
OP
Mind-boggling. No respect for the truth, or for human beings, whatsoever. Jesus. n/t
Judi Lynn
Apr 2018
#1
NEVER omit important context like NAMES if you want search engines to move prog analysis to top.
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2018
#3
I changed it. And thanks because I never thought about that before posting on here
Maraya1969
Apr 2018
#8
Thanks. Glad my seed is growing! Rampant habit on DU to post without context. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2018
#9
Judi Lynn
(160,598 posts)1. Mind-boggling. No respect for the truth, or for human beings, whatsoever. Jesus. n/t
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)2. very evasive
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,032 posts)3. NEVER omit important context like NAMES if you want search engines to move prog analysis to top.
Wendy Vitter.
Maraya1969
(22,490 posts)8. I changed it. And thanks because I never thought about that before posting on here
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,032 posts)9. Thanks. Glad my seed is growing! Rampant habit on DU to post without context. . . nt
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)4. What has she been nominated for? eom
shanny
(6,709 posts)5. federal judicial nominee nt
JDC
(10,130 posts)6. Jesus Christ. She is a ridiculous zealots.
They have no place in our judicial or our government at large.
Mc Mike
(9,115 posts)7. Maybe that Madame her hubby (diaper boy) killed, had taken the pill?
100% pro-life, pro-family rating. 'Devout' 'christians'.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)10. Lying liar from Liarsville!
Ugh, she's disgusting.
dalton99a
(81,566 posts)11. Kick
IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)12. Crazy and racist.