General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThat time republicans threatened to IMPEACH Obama if he bombed Syria w/out congressional approval
Tuesday, September 3, 2013
Rep. Duncan Hunter said Tuesday that President Obama would be breaking the law and even inviting impeachment if he went ahead with strikes on Syria after a congressional rejection.
I think hes breaking the law if he strikes without congressional approval, Mr. Hunter, a California Republican, told The Washington Times. And if he proceeds without Congress providing that authority, it should be considered an impeachable offense.
Unless the presidents willing to go to war with Syria and send my Marines back in to another country in the region, you dont just fire warning shots, and you dont lob a few missiles and say OK, wipe your hands, job well done, theyre deterred, Mr. Hunter said.
If were going to authorize the use of force, and we do strike Syria, we need to go all in, 100 percent, hell-bent on setting them back a decade when it comes to their weapons capability, period. There can be no half-measures, Mr. Hunter said.
01/18/17
Top aide: Obama worried about impeachment for Syria actions
President Obama's deputy national security adviser says in a new interview that the threat of impeachment "was a factor" in Obama's decision not to pursue a tougher intervention policy in Syria.
"We actually had Congress warning us against taking action without congressional authorization, which we interpreted as the president could face impeachment," Ben Rhodes told Politico Magazine.
When asked to elaborate, the president's adviser said that Republicans, including then-Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), made it clear that premature military action without congressional approval would be unconstitutional.
"That was a factor. Go back and read the letters from Boehner, letters from the Republican members of Congress. They laid down markers that this would not be constitutional. If we got drawn into a conflict in Syria without congressional authorization, without international authorization, without international support, you can see very clearly how that could have completely derailed this entire presidency," Rhodes told the publication.
Beartracks
(12,821 posts)MyOwnPeace
(16,937 posts)THAT is the serious issue facing our democracy - how much are they willing to throw away to get their own greedy demands?
Vinca
(50,300 posts)tclambert
(11,087 posts)Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)Last edited Sat Apr 14, 2018, 02:05 PM - Edit history (1)
with no core values of any degree of decency.
erronis
(15,324 posts)We're not far from the crows and the apes and every other living creature. We lie, cheat, steal, feint, sleep with others and each other.
The difference between the rest of the natural world and ourselves is that we say we are "civilized". We follow rules.
But in the end, the worst offenders are the ones who mock the system and play it to the detriment of everyone else.
Fortunately, in the last 30-40 years the worst offenders came with a moniker: repuglicons.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)So nasty and so funny at the same time.
PufPuf23
(8,813 posts)Far different rules too often in practice.
Regards war and war making too many Democrats slip easily in tune. Good evidence that there are neoliberalsand neoconservative enablers in the Democratic Party.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)BadgerMom
(2,771 posts)Hypocrites and partisans, not patriots-such are Republicans.
dchill
(38,516 posts)appalachiablue
(41,168 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,685 posts)malaise
(269,144 posts)It's a fugging joke to these unprincipled scumbags.
BlueWI
(1,736 posts)I appreciate the reminder of GOP intransigence on this issue.
What are Democrats going to do in response? Tremble in fear, or do what's warranted and stand firm?
The Democratic Party has seen repeatedly who Republicans are in 2018. What's the next move???