Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(86,005 posts)
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 12:28 PM Apr 2018

That time republicans threatened to IMPEACH Obama if he bombed Syria w/out congressional approval

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Rep. Duncan Hunter said Tuesday that President Obama would be breaking the law and even inviting impeachment if he went ahead with strikes on Syria after a congressional rejection.

“I think he’s breaking the law if he strikes without congressional approval,” Mr. Hunter, a California Republican, told The Washington Times. “And if he proceeds without Congress providing that authority, it should be considered an impeachable offense.”

“Unless the president’s willing to go to war with Syria and send my Marines back in to another country in the region, you don’t just fire warning shots, and you don’t lob a few missiles and say OK, wipe your hands, job well done, they’re deterred,” Mr. Hunter said.

“If we’re going to authorize the use of force, and we do strike Syria, we need to go all in, 100 percent, hell-bent on setting them back a decade when it comes to their weapons capability, period. There can be no half-measures,” Mr. Hunter said.


01/18/17
Top aide: Obama worried about impeachment for Syria actions

President Obama's deputy national security adviser says in a new interview that the threat of impeachment "was a factor" in Obama's decision not to pursue a tougher intervention policy in Syria.

"We actually had Congress warning us against taking action without congressional authorization, which we interpreted as the president could face impeachment," Ben Rhodes told Politico Magazine.

When asked to elaborate, the president's adviser said that Republicans, including then-Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), made it clear that premature military action without congressional approval would be unconstitutional.

"That was a factor. Go back and read the letters from Boehner, letters from the Republican members of Congress. They laid down markers that this would not be constitutional. If we got drawn into a conflict in Syria without congressional authorization, without international authorization, without international support, you can see very clearly how that could have completely derailed this entire presidency," Rhodes told the publication.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
That time republicans threatened to IMPEACH Obama if he bombed Syria w/out congressional approval (Original Post) bigtree Apr 2018 OP
K&R Beartracks Apr 2018 #1
K&R CrispyQ Apr 2018 #2
Exactly! KPN Apr 2018 #4
Yes, indeed! MyOwnPeace Apr 2018 #12
They threatened Obama with impeachment if he burped without covering his mouth. Vinca Apr 2018 #3
+1 dalton99a Apr 2018 #5
How close did he get to impeachment for wearing a tan suit? tclambert Apr 2018 #6
Yet more evidence that republicans are total hypocrites Achilleaze Apr 2018 #7
Yes, but they are RIGHTEOUS hypocrites. They are BLESSED. They Walk On Water and pee wine. erronis Apr 2018 #8
lol, "pee wine" Tarc Apr 2018 #18
The GOP acts as if they have different rules and alas they appear to have PufPuf23 Apr 2018 #9
K&R Scurrilous Apr 2018 #10
K and R BadgerMom Apr 2018 #11
Today's installment of "Where are they now?" dchill Apr 2018 #13
K & R Hypocrits, supremacists and reactionaries. Has to end. appalachiablue Apr 2018 #14
Trump has done it twice... Wounded Bear Apr 2018 #15
The same rules never apply to ReTHUGs malaise Apr 2018 #16
This is who the GOP is. BlueWI Apr 2018 #17

MyOwnPeace

(16,937 posts)
12. Yes, indeed!
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 02:33 PM
Apr 2018

THAT is the serious issue facing our democracy - how much are they willing to throw away to get their own greedy demands?

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)
7. Yet more evidence that republicans are total hypocrites
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 01:22 PM
Apr 2018

Last edited Sat Apr 14, 2018, 02:05 PM - Edit history (1)

with no core values of any degree of decency.

erronis

(15,324 posts)
8. Yes, but they are RIGHTEOUS hypocrites. They are BLESSED. They Walk On Water and pee wine.
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 01:41 PM
Apr 2018

We're not far from the crows and the apes and every other living creature. We lie, cheat, steal, feint, sleep with others and each other.

The difference between the rest of the natural world and ourselves is that we say we are "civilized". We follow rules.

But in the end, the worst offenders are the ones who mock the system and play it to the detriment of everyone else.

Fortunately, in the last 30-40 years the worst offenders came with a moniker: repuglicons.

PufPuf23

(8,813 posts)
9. The GOP acts as if they have different rules and alas they appear to have
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 01:46 PM
Apr 2018

Far different rules too often in practice.

Regards war and war making too many Democrats slip easily in tune. Good evidence that there are neoliberalsand neoconservative enablers in the Democratic Party.

BlueWI

(1,736 posts)
17. This is who the GOP is.
Sun Apr 15, 2018, 09:26 AM
Apr 2018

I appreciate the reminder of GOP intransigence on this issue.

What are Democrats going to do in response? Tremble in fear, or do what's warranted and stand firm?

The Democratic Party has seen repeatedly who Republicans are in 2018. What's the next move???

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»That time republicans thr...