Michael Cohen's own attorney won't attest to Cohen's claim of debunking the Steele dossier .
"This arduous journey began for Mr. Cohen over 16 months ago with the publication of his name in the so-called Steele dossier. The references to Mr. Cohen in the Steele dossier are false and have been completely debunked."
Though that is the beginning of the "Statements of Fact" in the lawyer's motion, unlike all the other statements of fact, Cohen's lawyer does not attest to he truth of that statement.
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/michael-cohens-own-attorney-isnt-swearing-to-his-story-regarding-steele-dossier/
Notice that the end of each sentence contains a paragraph symbol (¶) and numerical value. This signals to the court that the assertions made in the Statement of Fact section are actually supported. Most of the rest of the assertions made in the Cohen-Harrison Statement of Fact section contain cited references to Harrisons declaration. The Steele dossier paragraph is the only paragraph in the Statement of Fact section which does not contain a single reference to Harrisons sworn affidavit.
In fact, one look at the declaration signed by Harrison shows that he doesnt make any declarations about the Steele dossier at all.
Therefore, as national security journalist Marcy Wheeler noted:
"Cohen would like Judge Kimba Wood to believe that the dossier has been debunked. But his lawyer is unwilling to stake his own legal reputation on the claim."