General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo...Trump IS, basically, Cohen's only "client."
If what Hannity said is true (and that's a big IF), then all he did was call him a few times and ask his opinion on some things, and he never paid for it.
That leaves only Trump as the client...except for that GOP guy who he handled a payoff of someone for. I suspect that's a stretch, and it was a favor on behalf of Trump.
If Trump is the only real client, then that adds to the fed's case that Cohen isn't really a practicing attorney.
They would look for invoices to Trump, descriptions of "work" performed, lists of expenses. The normal things a lawyer sends to his client. I bet there aren't such normal things.
Demsrule86
(68,582 posts)harassment or a girlfriend.
Kirk Lover
(3,608 posts)please be my client.
exboyfil
(17,863 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)I betcha.
unblock
(52,243 posts)it's that he produces a virtually endless fountain of legal work.
invoices? hours? donnie could cut him a check for a few million once a year.
there's plenty of criminality and scandal going on here, but donnie being virtually his only client is not one of them.
on the contrary, donnie seemingly having only one fixer, that's the real mystery.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Practicing lawyers have some of the wealthiest people in the world as their client, as well as large corporations. They still usu. have other clients. For one thing, as a practical matter, you'd be unemployed if you lost that one client. So it adds to the claim that he's not a practicing lawyer, although that can be rebutted, if he can show proof that he was acting as an attorney. I suspect the govt already knows Cohen doesn't have that proof.
It's like an accountant. Even if you're on a retainer, you keep records of your time, what you did, the expenses, etc., to show the client if asked, or to show the IRS, and for your own reference.
unblock
(52,243 posts)That doesn't have anything to do with him not practicing law.
He was obviously was involved in some non-disclosure contracts, that's practicing law right there. Granted, a non-lawyer could draft a contract as well, but a lawyer would presumably have additional expertise.
I really don't see this as something to make a fuss about.
Plenty of other incredibly outrageous things going on.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)I'm not arguing about this. I'm saying what the govt has said in court: That Cohen is not an actual practicing attorney, if he doesn't spend a certain percentage of his time...practicing law. If he spends most of his time threatening people, traveling to foreign countries to meet with criminals, and other things...that's not practicing law.
It really does matter. As I said, it's rebuttable. Cohen can show he was really acting as a "lawyer" for Trump. But doing catch and kill duties with NDAs isn't going to rise to that level, I suspect. He'll have to show what attorneys normally show: bills, invoices, lists of expenses, notes on his duties, etc. Even if he was on a retainer.
Thrill
(19,178 posts)Hannity is so full of shit