to tell the WT (of all publications) that is not believable.

Sounds a bit off.

Hmm, interesting. I smell a rat too.

When I first read it this morning, my speed reading subconscious (or unconscious) brain read Wapo/Times. It's no coincidence that Washington Times named themselves that. When you're on information overload, you might have a brain fart quite often. There's another media outlet with Washington in it that is leftist, and I can't keep them straight.

Mueller spokesperson wouldn't be going to Washington Times to get that info out.

It's still owned by the Unification Church under the name News World Communications- also own UPI

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Times

Also didn't know that it's an actual newspaper...thought it was just online. Yikes.

before Brock saw the light. Ann Coulter wasn't on the staff (if I'm remembering Brock's book correctly) but the three of them hung out together. The Times was part of the initial creation of the stable of right wing writers.

of that article, and suggested that they check with Mueller's office to see if a statement was released to the WT.
If not, then please remove the article. I would think Mueller's office would at least answer if they made a statement
or not.

There is an email link on top of article.

than surströmming in the microwave.

Must be getting close.

Your OP links to a Washington Times article where they say they got the statement from The Daily Caller.