Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,999 posts)
Tue Apr 17, 2018, 11:58 AM Apr 2018

Gorsuch joins liberal justices to end mandatory deportation of immigrants convicted of some crimes

Jim Sciutto @jimsciutto

Breaking: Supreme Court invalidates part of federal law requiring mandatory deportation of immigrants convicted of some crimes. For first time, Justice Neil Gorsuch joins with more liberal Justices to produce 5-4 majority -@Arianedevogue reports

CNN:

The case, Sessions v. Dimaya, had been closely watched to see if the justices would reveal how they will consider the Trump administration’s overall push to both limit immigration and increase deportations.

As expected after the oral argument, Justice Neil Gorsuch joined with the more liberal justices for the first time since joining the court to produce a 5-4 majority invalidating the federal statute. In doing so, Gorsuch was continuing the jurisprudence of Justice Antonin Scalia, who also sided with liberals when it came to the vagueness of statutes used to convict criminal defendants.

Dimaya, a native of the Philippines, was admitted to the United States in 1992 as a lawful permanent resident. In 2007 and 2009, he pleaded no contest to charges of residential burglary in California and an immigration judge determined that Dimaya was removable from the US because of his two state court convictions.

The court held that the convictions qualified for an “aggravated felony” under the Immigration and Nationality Act, which authorizes removal of non-citizens who have been convicted of some violent crimes and defines aggravated felony to include “crimes of violence.”

read: https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/17/politics/supreme-court-federal-law-deportation-immigrants/index.html/


11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gorsuch joins liberal justices to end mandatory deportation of immigrants convicted of some crimes (Original Post) bigtree Apr 2018 OP
It would be a riot if he turned out to PCIntern Apr 2018 #1
Well, that's good news. I'd like to hear why Gorsuch did this. n/t CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2018 #2
It is no secret he is on the wrong side of every issue, just about, so yes, what is the reason? Eliot Rosewater Apr 2018 #4
apparently upholding some Scalia ruling from 2015 bigtree Apr 2018 #6
Interesting, and again Kennedy fails due process still_one Apr 2018 #3
I read about this this morning ismnotwasm Apr 2018 #5
I've always found it fascinating how democrank Apr 2018 #7
this was done to preserve some conservative principle bigtree Apr 2018 #8
I was interested in the fact that Gorsuch joined the more liberal justices democrank Apr 2018 #9
well, on this issue bigtree Apr 2018 #10
Maybe a lot of people hold these views but never speak up RhodeIslandOne Apr 2018 #11

bigtree

(85,999 posts)
6. apparently upholding some Scalia ruling from 2015
Tue Apr 17, 2018, 12:12 PM
Apr 2018

...about an 'unconstitutionally vague' Armed Career Criminal Act provision.

I'd bet a dime to a dollar it's about protecting gun owners' rights who've had multiple convictions.

ismnotwasm

(41,992 posts)
5. I read about this this morning
Tue Apr 17, 2018, 12:03 PM
Apr 2018

Not sure what it means in practical terms, but I’m glad Gorsuch ruled on the merit of the law and not the politics

democrank

(11,096 posts)
7. I've always found it fascinating how
Tue Apr 17, 2018, 12:13 PM
Apr 2018

some of the most conservative people I know can hold a liberal position on certain issues and some of the most left-leaning people I know hold a conservative position on some issues. Examples: gun rights, abortion, death penalty, same-sex marriage.

Guess we don't all fit in standard pigeon holes.

democrank

(11,096 posts)
9. I was interested in the fact that Gorsuch joined the more liberal justices
Tue Apr 17, 2018, 12:25 PM
Apr 2018

rather than the more conservative one.

bigtree

(85,999 posts)
10. well, on this issue
Tue Apr 17, 2018, 12:36 PM
Apr 2018

...the reasons for their votes diverge.

Not the same as, for example, a red state Dem voting against gun safety legislation, or voting for abortion restrictions, believing in the conservative view of the underlying issue.

 

RhodeIslandOne

(5,042 posts)
11. Maybe a lot of people hold these views but never speak up
Tue Apr 17, 2018, 01:23 PM
Apr 2018

I’ve also never understood why say, being against universal health care also means you have to be against gay marriage or supporting tax cuts has to do with being all for the second amendment yet the right/left dichotomy seems to demand you either check all the boxes or you can’t come to the party.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gorsuch joins liberal jus...