General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBREAKING: ERIC HOLDER IS THINKING ABOUT RUNNING IN 2020
Just saw him on Chris Hayes. He says he's focused on his anti-gerrymandering project, but he's considering it.
That would be fabulous!
cilla4progress
(24,733 posts)It would.
I need to learn more about him.
Response to cilla4progress (Reply #1)
Name removed Message auto-removed
bearsfootball516
(6,377 posts)Polished, experienced and incredibly smart.
I think my only hesitation would be that in today's age where immigration is such a massive issue, Fast and the Furious might be a big anchor for the GOP to use to drag him down.
politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)reaches that station in life without ruffling a few feathers, or without some baggage. As I recall about Fast and Furious, Eric Holder didn't start it; he was the one who shut it down. He came in and shut it down and the Repugnants wanted to blame him as if he had been there all along from the beginning. Don't buy into their bullshit. They are the masters of deflection.
On September 19, 2012,[121] the Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz publicly released a 471-page report[1] detailing the results of the Justice Department's own internal investigations. The Inspector General's report, which had access to evidence and interviews with witnesses not permitted in previous Congressional reports, recommended 14 federal officials for disciplinary action, ranging from ATF agents to federal prosecutors involved in the Fast and Furious operation.[121] It found "no evidence" that Attorney General Holder knew about Fast and Furious before early 2011.[122] It found no evidence that previous Attorneys General had been advised about gunwalking in Operation Wide Receiver.[1]
While the OIG report found no evidence that higher officials at the Justice Department in Washington had authorized or approved of the tactics used in the Fast and Furious investigations, it did fault 14 lower officials for related failures, including failures to take note of "red flags" uncovered by the investigation, as well as failures to follow up on information produced through Operation Fast and Furious and its predecessor, Operation Wide Receiver.[121][123] The report also noted ATF agents' apparent frustrations over legal obstacles from the Phoenix Attorney's Office to prosecuting suspected "straw-buyers," while also criticizing the agents' failure to quickly intervene and interdict weapons obtained by low-level suspects in the case.[121] The 14 Justice Department employees were referred for possible internal discipline. The Justice Department's Criminal Division head Lanny Breuer, an Obama administration presidential appointee, was cited for not alerting his bosses in 2010 to the flaws of Operation Wide Receiver.[124] Deputy Assistant Attorney General Jason Weinstein, who was responsible for authorizing a portion of the wiretap applications in Operation Fast and Furious and faulted in the report for not identifying the gunwalking tactics, resigned on the day of the report.[125]
On December 4, 2012, the ATF Professional Review Board delivered its recommendations to high-level ATF managers, who will decide whether to accept them. The recommendations included firing William McMahon, ATF Deputy Assistant Director; Mark Chait, ATF Assistant Director for Field Operations; William Newell, Phoenix ATF Special Agent in Charge; and George Gillett, Newell's second in command. Two additional ATF employees, Phoenix supervisor David Voth and lead agent Hope McAllister, received recommendations for demotion and disciplinary transfer to another ATF post, respectively.[126][127] It was reported the next day that McMahon had been fired. It was also announced that Gary Grindler, Eric Holder's chief of staff who was faulted in the OIG report, would be leaving the Justice Department.[123] Later that month, the family of Brian Terry sued seven government officials and a gun shop involved in Operation Fast and Furious for negligence and wrongful death.[128]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_gunwalking_scandal
Lotusflower70
(3,077 posts)I would campaign like hell for him.
Snackshack
(2,541 posts)I dont know about that.
Because of Mr. Holder, Wall Street got a total pass on being held accountable for their actions that brought the economic world to its knees in 2008.
Noone from the 7 largest banks were prosecuted. Not all Holders fault though.
I say Inslee For President!!!
blake2012
(1,294 posts)In a criminal trial.
dem4decades
(11,293 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,593 posts)Motley13
(3,867 posts)american_ideals
(613 posts)Except hes not aggressive enough. He gave the torturers a pass.
Dems need a fighter. A Franklin Roosevelt.
Cha
(297,237 posts)week.
I'm glad.. we need his voice out there.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,611 posts)He was a substandard AG. He should have put the banksters in prison for life.
He has no chance of winning the nomination, I'll tell you right now.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)OregonBlue
(7,754 posts)who caused the melt-down in the first place. I would never vote for him.
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)leftieNanner
(15,100 posts)aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)Maybe.
samnsara
(17,622 posts)spooky3
(34,452 posts)because she had also asked Holder that question but he was vague. So she congratulated Chris for being a better interviewer!
Response to leftieNanner (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Takket
(21,568 posts)leftieNanner
(15,100 posts)There are quite a few good ones out there.
Renew Deal
(81,859 posts)blake2012
(1,294 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)what state does he call home now? Are there any Republicans he can challenge?
Gothmog
(145,242 posts)Demsrule86
(68,576 posts)Vinca
(50,271 posts)RDANGELO
(3,433 posts)I'm not sure he would be a good candidate. I would want to see his favorabilities. People are likely to already have fairly strong convictions about him. If he is strongly underwater with independents, that would not be good.
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)It's make a certain slice of the democratic party happy, but in general I think he'd get beat up pretty bad. He's not going to be popular with anything like the Bernie wing or the Warren wing. The Clinton/Obama wing probably would be interested. Not sure how he rates with independents. I think you'd see the whole Obama/Clinton '08 primary all over again where Hillary got beat up daily for her Iraq vote. All the other primary candidates would beat him up over bankers and torturers and that's all we'd hear.
Now, as a VP choice....
Runningdawg
(4,516 posts)you would hear Fast and Furious repeated more often than Benghazi. He doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)I like him, but I don't think we should nominate someone who served in a previous administration. He would have to spend too much time defending criticisms, which will be many, of his work and Obama's administration. I think it would be better to have a candidate with some distance from past presidencies, so that they can focus on the future and repairing the considerable damage these 4 yrs are bringing.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)"I don't know. We'll see. I haven't decided yet," Holder, 67, said when asked about his plans for a possible challenge to President Trump.
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/381074-eric-holder-to-decide-on-a-2020-run-by-early-next-year
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)If one looks back at the story of America, but ignores past deficiencies or forgets the people who were denied rights to which all Americans are entitled, then the past can be, for some, to a minority, a comforting place. But it also betrays a lack of courage. It speaks to a fear of the future, which is, by its very nature, always uncertain. And is antithetical to who we are as a people. We have always embraced the possibility of the future, not the comfort of the past.
It has been that attribute that has made the American nature truly exceptional and the Democratic Party the instrument of the people. We are not held down or beholden to a fictional past. We Democrats look to the future with its possibilities of positive change and new challenges and have always there to make it ours and so it must be again.
Our party must be clear on the issues of the day and all who seek the nominations of our party must identify themselves as Democrats and be damn proud of it! Our present positions must be rooted in the traditions of our great democratic past. It is Democrats who gave the nation Social Security,. It is Democrats who gave the nation Medicare and Medicaid. It is Democrats who gave the nation the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act. It is Democrats who gave the nation the Affordable Care Act. And it is Democrats that have given the country so much more. It is the Democratic Party that has used government power to make better the lives of average Americans, irrespective of their status but with an emphasis on those those who are most at risk.
Now is not a time to be beholden to ideological litmus tests. The stakes are too high, our democracy is too much at risk for us to be so divided when there is actually so little that actually divides us. Our party is made up of disparate parts but it is held together by common interests.
Eric Holder - Remarks at the Ohio Democratic Party Legacy Dinner, Columbus, Ohio, April 13, 2018
https://www.facebook.com/OHDems/videos/10155553345588526/