Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Republicans’ Medicaid Cruelty
The Republicans Medicaid Cruelty
Jeff Madrick
The essential American soul, claimed D.H. Lawrence, is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. While the rejection by five state governments of the Affordable Care Acts Medicaid expansion may not precisely illustrate Lawrences heated observation, it does suggest a contemporary vein of cruelty in America that is deeply disturbing.
A new study published in The New England Journal of Medicine shows that providing greater medical insurance coverage for the poor has saved lives. Moreover, the ACAs expansion of Medicaid requires little state money, since the federal government will pick up more than 90 percent of the costs over time, and 100 percent of the costs for the first few years. Yet Texas, Florida, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Mississippiwhich together account for more than a sixth of the overall US populationhave already rejected the plan, and as many as twenty other states, including New Jersey, Missouri, Iowa, Nebraska, and Nevada, have indicated they may follow suit.
Furthermore, these states already have among the highest numbers of citizens with no health insurance. Twenty-five percent of non-elderly Texans have no health insurance, for example, compared to the national average of about 18 percent. If the Obama Medicaid reforms were fully implemented, 15 to 17 million of the nations 50 million without health insurance would be covered. In a report just issued in late July, however, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that the Medicaid expansion will only cover some ten million more, or a full third fewer than anticipated, because of the rejection of the plan by large states like Florida and Texas and others who have not yet formally announced their intentions.
<...>
What has enabled states to reject the expansion is the curveball thrown by the Supreme Court in its decision in June to uphold President Obamas Affordable Care Act: not only did the court argue that the states need not participate in the new expansion, which the Obama administration had intended to be mandatory; it also said that the federal government could not withhold Medicaid payments for states that decide not to participate. Thus, the court created a way to undermine one of the most admirable achievements of the ACA, a sweeping expansion of a medical safety net for the neediest.
- more -
http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2012/jul/30/medicaid-cruelty/
Jeff Madrick
The essential American soul, claimed D.H. Lawrence, is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. While the rejection by five state governments of the Affordable Care Acts Medicaid expansion may not precisely illustrate Lawrences heated observation, it does suggest a contemporary vein of cruelty in America that is deeply disturbing.
A new study published in The New England Journal of Medicine shows that providing greater medical insurance coverage for the poor has saved lives. Moreover, the ACAs expansion of Medicaid requires little state money, since the federal government will pick up more than 90 percent of the costs over time, and 100 percent of the costs for the first few years. Yet Texas, Florida, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Mississippiwhich together account for more than a sixth of the overall US populationhave already rejected the plan, and as many as twenty other states, including New Jersey, Missouri, Iowa, Nebraska, and Nevada, have indicated they may follow suit.
Furthermore, these states already have among the highest numbers of citizens with no health insurance. Twenty-five percent of non-elderly Texans have no health insurance, for example, compared to the national average of about 18 percent. If the Obama Medicaid reforms were fully implemented, 15 to 17 million of the nations 50 million without health insurance would be covered. In a report just issued in late July, however, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that the Medicaid expansion will only cover some ten million more, or a full third fewer than anticipated, because of the rejection of the plan by large states like Florida and Texas and others who have not yet formally announced their intentions.
<...>
What has enabled states to reject the expansion is the curveball thrown by the Supreme Court in its decision in June to uphold President Obamas Affordable Care Act: not only did the court argue that the states need not participate in the new expansion, which the Obama administration had intended to be mandatory; it also said that the federal government could not withhold Medicaid payments for states that decide not to participate. Thus, the court created a way to undermine one of the most admirable achievements of the ACA, a sweeping expansion of a medical safety net for the neediest.
- more -
http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2012/jul/30/medicaid-cruelty/
Six governors say they will opt out of Medicaid. How long will they hold out?
Posted by Sarah Kliff
<...>
While the stakes are high for the White House, the territory is by no means uncharted. Washington has twice faced off with states over federal health care expansions, when Medicaid initially launched in 1965 and with the Childrens Health Insurance Program in 1997. In both cases, all 50 states ultimately signed up but not without some wrangling.
<...>
Medicaid got a chilly reception when it launched in January 1966. It was up to the states to decide whether to participate and only six initially signed up: Hawaii, Illinois, Minnesota, North Dakota, Oklahoma and Pennsylvania. Twenty-seven followed suit later that year. Across the country, governors weighed the boon of new federal dollars Washington would foot half of Medicaids bill against the drawback of putting state money into a new program.
Nascent Medicaid programs quickly faced threats: Republican legislators in the New York introduced a bill in 1967 calling for the state to live within its means and repeal its Medicaid program.
<...>
Over time, however, the lure of federal dollars proved strong enough to win over resistant states. Eleven joined the program in 1967. Another wave of eight, largely Southern states came on board in 1970. Arizona proved the last holdout, not joining Medicaid until 1982.
- more -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/07/09/six-governors-say-they-will-opt-out-of-medicaid-how-long-will-they-hold-out/
Posted by Sarah Kliff
<...>
While the stakes are high for the White House, the territory is by no means uncharted. Washington has twice faced off with states over federal health care expansions, when Medicaid initially launched in 1965 and with the Childrens Health Insurance Program in 1997. In both cases, all 50 states ultimately signed up but not without some wrangling.
<...>
Medicaid got a chilly reception when it launched in January 1966. It was up to the states to decide whether to participate and only six initially signed up: Hawaii, Illinois, Minnesota, North Dakota, Oklahoma and Pennsylvania. Twenty-seven followed suit later that year. Across the country, governors weighed the boon of new federal dollars Washington would foot half of Medicaids bill against the drawback of putting state money into a new program.
Nascent Medicaid programs quickly faced threats: Republican legislators in the New York introduced a bill in 1967 calling for the state to live within its means and repeal its Medicaid program.
<...>
Over time, however, the lure of federal dollars proved strong enough to win over resistant states. Eleven joined the program in 1967. Another wave of eight, largely Southern states came on board in 1970. Arizona proved the last holdout, not joining Medicaid until 1982.
- more -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/07/09/six-governors-say-they-will-opt-out-of-medicaid-how-long-will-they-hold-out/
States stand to lose a lot more than Medicaid funding by refusing the expansion
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002914241
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1016 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Republicans’ Medicaid Cruelty (Original Post)
ProSense
Jul 2012
OP
ProSense
(116,464 posts)1. Kick
because we're not Republicans and value facts.
Sanddancer
(52 posts)2. WaTi Medicaid Article.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/aug/14/anti-medicaid-states-earning-11000-too-much/
The fact this article appeared in the Washington Times suprised me.
"In South Carolina, a yearly income of $16,900 is too much for Medicaid for a family of three. In Florida, $11,000 a year is too much. In Mississippi, $8,200 a year is too much. In Louisiana and Texas, earning more than just $5,000 a year makes you ineligible for Medicaid."
"Governors in those five states have said theyll reject the Medicaid expansion underpinning Obamas health law after the Supreme Courts decision gave states that option."
This makes America great?
The fact this article appeared in the Washington Times suprised me.
"In South Carolina, a yearly income of $16,900 is too much for Medicaid for a family of three. In Florida, $11,000 a year is too much. In Mississippi, $8,200 a year is too much. In Louisiana and Texas, earning more than just $5,000 a year makes you ineligible for Medicaid."
"Governors in those five states have said theyll reject the Medicaid expansion underpinning Obamas health law after the Supreme Courts decision gave states that option."
This makes America great?