Clear?

as an unindicted co-conspirator, and the current U.S. Attorney's Manual says: "In the absence of some significant justification, federal prosecutors generally should not identify unindicted co-conspirators in conspiracy indictments." It could happen but so far it hasn't, and if Mueller follows DoJ guidance it probably won't.

maybe there is some bill already.

Only tell him if a positive if have info: NOT a target now; or Yes, a target now.

can't/shouldn't be indicted, of course Spanky isn't a target. A target is someone as to whom there is significant evidence of a crime and that they are a putative defendant. A person who can't be indicted can't be a putative defendant and therefore they can't be a target. So he could make that statement perfectly truthfully, and coincidentally maybe salvage his job, since Trump probably doesn't understand what any of this means.

or Mueller will find a way to indict him.

because without Rosenstein Mueller investigation could be seriously curtailed..

It would be SO worth it. I would be the happiest dude in the unemployment line.

A former prosecutor from the US Attorney office told Rachel that Dept. guidedlines require that answer if asked. However, a person may eventually become a target.

That the more people he fires, the more he fusses, the guiltier he looks? It is also another example of him obstructing justice.

Voicemails. Emails. Interviews. Leaks. Meetings. Skywriting...

But that’s me.