General Discussion

DonViejo

(60,536 posts) Sat Apr 21, 2018, 02:58 PM Apr 2018

Why Trump has struggled to assemble a legal team

By Annie Linskey GLOBE STAFF APRIL 21, 2018

WASHINGTON — When President Richard Nixon got into legal trouble, a team of top lawyers signed up to represent him. And as Bill Clinton found himself staring down a grand jury, another crop of elite attorneys stood at his side.

But the lure of representing the most powerful man in the world isn’t appealing to this generation’s cadre of top white-collar criminal defense attorneys: Twelve partners from a total of seven firms have said no to President Trump’s entreaties to help him navigate the special counsel’s probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

Being turned down time and again led Trump to pick former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani this week, turning to a former presidential candidate and one-time US attorney who was known for his at times imprecise but often effective advocacy of Trump on the campaign trail in 2016. Trump also brought on board a relatively obscure husband-and-wife team of former federal prosecutors with a white-collar criminal defense practice in South Florida.

It’s hard to call it a dream team.

“Rudy Giuliani has always been available,” said Roger Cossack, a former California prosecutor and legal analyst on TV. “Hiring Rudy Giuliani only underlines Trump’s dilemma in finding a lawyer who will work for him.”

The other two new hires, Jane and Martin Raskin, both have experience as federal prosecutors, he as an assistant US attorney in New Jersey, she as first assistant US attorney in Massachusetts. (Her Boston ties go further: A graduate of Wellesley College, she went to Boston College Law School.) But they are new players on the nation’s largest stage, and don’t have the typical profile for the defense of a president contending with a sprawling federal investigation. The couple’s recent headline-grabbing cases include successfully defending an ICE agent accused of trying to shake down a drug organization, and representing a woman accused of submitting false claims to Medicare and Medicaid.

more
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2018/04/21/why-most-powerful-man-world-has-struggled-assemble-legal-team/hnXwFeot3YmytSVt9bNAyH/story.html?event=event25

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why Trump has struggled to assemble a legal team (Original Post) DonViejo Apr 2018 OP

It's really simple, because of Trumps attitude 1% have no idea how the rest America even survives FairDemocrat Apr 2018 #1

You're referring to the Fairness Doctrine that was struck down in 1987 FakeNoose Apr 2018 #3

"Fox News" refers to the cable-TV network and cable-TV was never covered by the fairness doctrine. PoliticAverse Apr 2018 #4

Rule #1 for Lawyers-They Expect to be Paid dlk Apr 2018 #2

Giuliani has taken a leave of absence from his law firm and is doing his service to Trump for free no_hypocrisy Apr 2018 #5

FairDemocrat

(82 posts)

1. It's really simple, because of Trumps attitude 1% have no idea how the rest America even survives

Reply to DonViejo (Original post)

Sat Apr 21, 2018, 03:11 PM

Apr 2018

I got to go back to Ronald Reagans 30 year plan over rebuilding America. Open forum networks to compete with the news media. I am pretty sure they created a law in 1987 that allowed the networks like Fox and Talk Radio to come to be...Fox came on the scene in 1990 I believe..Fox only played cartoons and Leave it to Beaver, and Gomer Pyle...I could find the link to law the Reagans passed that allowed this mess, but what is the point now. Democrats have to step their game up.

FakeNoose

(32,714 posts)

3. You're referring to the Fairness Doctrine that was struck down in 1987

Reply to FairDemocrat (Reply #1)

Sat Apr 21, 2018, 03:26 PM

Apr 2018

Ronald Reagan was responsible for ending the Fairness Doctrine (an FCC requirement) that made every TV news station responsible for providing "equal time" for both sides of every issue. E.g. the Democrats get to have equal time to answer a speech by a Republican president, etc.

Once the Fairness Doctrine ended, news outlets like Fox News were allowed to exist that provided only conservative viewpoints on every issue. Nowadays they've taken it even further - they tell nothing but lies and nobody can demand equal time to present the truth. It's a shame on our democracy and an insult to liberty.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)

4. "Fox News" refers to the cable-TV network and cable-TV was never covered by the fairness doctrine.

Reply to FakeNoose (Reply #3)

Sat Apr 21, 2018, 04:06 PM

Apr 2018

dlk

(11,575 posts)

2. Rule #1 for Lawyers-They Expect to be Paid

Reply to DonViejo (Original post)

Sat Apr 21, 2018, 03:13 PM

Apr 2018

Trump has a long, documented history of stiffing nearly everyone, as is typical with con artists. Lawyers won't represent someone if there's even a hint they won't get paid. Trump did this to himself.

no_hypocrisy

(46,158 posts)

5. Giuliani has taken a leave of absence from his law firm and is doing his service to Trump for free

Reply to dlk (Reply #2)

Sat Apr 21, 2018, 05:56 PM

Apr 2018

(pro bono).

As we all know, NOTHING is free. Giuliani is expecting to collect a marker from Trump when Giuliani chooses. (IOW, a big favor)

Trump's mentor, Roy Cohn, was famous for this: he'd collect markers and call them in without warning. The markers were usually worth more than the money value of the services rendered.

OK, now you're thinking that Trump can stiff Giuliani and not give the marker. No prob! Giuliani has known Trump for nearly 40 years and knows where the bodies are buried. A couple of phonecalls, and there will be enforcement.

Reply to this discussion