Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNEW Policy Documents the EPA Does Not Want You to See-guided by political appointees, NOT scientists
There are links to the stories and documents....
Union of Concerned Scientists
Photo: US Department of Defense
Here are the Transparency Policy Documents the EPA Does Not Want You to See
Yogin Kothari, Washington representative, Center for Science and Democracy | April 21, 2018, 11:20 am EDT
On April 17th, the Union of Concerned Scientists obtained EPA records through three separate Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests demonstrating that a proposed Trojan horse transparency policy that would restrict the agencys ability to use the best available science in decision-making is driven by politics, not science. The records also embarrassingly showed EPA officials were more concerned about the release of industry trade secrets than they were about sensitive private medical information.
Three days later, EPA officials removed the records from an online portal where anyone could review them.
Today, UCS restored public access by posting almost all of the responsive documents (more than 100 out of the 124 responsive records) related to the so-called secret science policy.
The documents obtained by UCS provide insight into how political appointees and industry interests, not science, are driving EPA's pursuit of administratively implementing failed anti-science legislation.
The documents obtained by UCS provide insight into how political appointees and industry interests, not science, are driving EPAs pursuit of administratively implementing failed anti-science legislation.
EPA removed the documents after extensive reporting on the contents, including by reporters at POLITICO, The Hill, E&E News, Reuters, and Mother Jones. In each of those stories, which I encourage you to read, journalists highlighted how EPA officials are attempting to administratively implement failed anti-science legislation advanced by House Science Committee Chairman Lamar Smith, to benefit industries the agency is in charge of regulating and at the publics expense.
The documents provided a window into the considerations of many agency officials, and showed that a policy that would be a fundamental shift in the way EPA uses science, was driven exclusively by political appointees, not scientists.
There were a number of documents on other topics that were also included in the records that were responsive to our public records request, that we are still reviewing. However, as a result of EPAs actions, public access was denied.
My colleague and I spent much of our Friday afternoon trying to figure out why the documents were taken down. We repeatedly reached out to the agency, and were informed that the records were removed because of concerns about privacy information and attorney-client communication. Before posting the documents online, we spent some time going through all of the records and removed any documents that could be considered as private in nature (i.e. family pictures, etc.) or represent such privileged communication.
The irony here is not lost on me, as EPA tries to hide records that are critical to understanding the policy development process while officials try to develop a policy about transparency in the agencys use of science.
The agency on Thursday sent a proposed policy to the White House for review. This means that a policy to restrict independent science can be announced any day now. These documents are critical to reporting around the motivation for the policy and to evaluate EPA Administrator Scott Pruitts claims of improving transparency in policymaking at the agency.........................
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 528 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NEW Policy Documents the EPA Does Not Want You to See-guided by political appointees, NOT scientists (Original Post)
riversedge
Apr 2018
OP
BigmanPigman
(51,630 posts)1. The admin started doing this 14 months ago...
almost as soon as they got into DC. Not only were staffs cut or forced out but their research was cut and the research that had been collected, including climate change info, was kept restricted and is not allowed out of the govt computers to the public. We have to rely on our friends in other countries who are still allowed to continue research and share their info with us. This is a criminal enterprise. We must VOTE THEM OUT!