General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVermont gets a D+ for poor progress toward Lake Champlain clean up By Mike Polhamus Apr 24 2018, 6:
The Conservation Law Foundation has given the state of Vermont a D+ for poor progress toward a clean-up of Lake Champlain. Issuing its annual Lake Champlain Report Card on Monday, the environmental watchdog said The near-failing grade is the result of a consistent pattern of missed deadlines, weak treatment standards and a lack of investment in clean-up programs.
The foundations grade is in marked contrast to the self-evaluation by Anson Tebbetts, the state Secretary of Agriculture, Food and Markets, who issued a statement earlier in April saying the state had been given all As for its efforts so far, by the Environmental Protection Agency.
The EPA report card, issued in early April, in fact gave Vermont only a provisional pass because the state had not yet reached a number of milestones the EPA had set in its pollution reduction order for Lake Champlain. They included long-term funding for clean water as well as plans for treating stormwater runoff in certain cities and towns and from large-area developments.
The EPA issued an order to limit additional phosphorus pollution in Lake Champlain in 2016, following the passage of Act 63, Vermonts Clean Water Act. To comply with the EPA order, the state must report annually to the EPA on its progress toward achieving the limits, referred to as the Total Maximum Daily Load.
Instead of As the EPA gave the state one year to fulfill three conditions of the federal pollution-reduction order that are currently overdue.
https://vtdigger.org/2018/04/24/vermont-gets-d-poor-progress-toward-lake-champlain-clean/
more....
Fiendish Thingy
(15,669 posts)Was there another Vermonter you feel deserves the blame?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)F for failing to meet the end-2017 deadline to identify a source of long-term funding.
F for failing to meet another December 2017 deadline, to establish a permit for stormwater runoff from large paved areas, such as parking lots. Not only did the state fail to establish the permit, it sought to weaken the standards for treating water pollution in some parts of the state.
D- for failing to update the existing permit for how certain cities and towns handle stormwater runoff and sewage.
D for completing three months after the deadline regulations governing Required Agricultural Practices, another requirement of the TMDL, and failing to include important protections for the states public waters, such as pollution-management plans for farms.
D for failing to establish rules for pipes aiding in subsurface drainage from farm fields.
D for failing to update in a timely fashion an agreement reached by the Agency of Natural Resources and the Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets for managing agricultural runoff.
I don't see anyone specifically called out.
Blue_Adept
(6,402 posts)Some folks must just feel like they're constantly being attacked or have to go on the offensive for any perceived slight...
R B Garr
(16,993 posts)"another Vermonter"? Everyone is in the bag, no other distinctions necessary.
But this does look out of touch. If you're going to use Al Gore as a prop, might as well check for environmental compliancy in your own state.