Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

George II

(67,782 posts)
Wed Apr 25, 2018, 10:41 AM Apr 2018

Vermont gets a D+ for poor progress toward Lake Champlain clean up By Mike Polhamus Apr 24 2018, 6:

The Conservation Law Foundation has given the state of Vermont a D+ for poor progress toward a clean-up of Lake Champlain. Issuing its annual Lake Champlain Report Card on Monday, the environmental watchdog said “The near-failing grade is the result of a consistent pattern of missed deadlines, weak treatment standards and a lack of investment in clean-up programs.”

The foundation’s grade is in marked contrast to the self-evaluation by Anson Tebbetts, the state Secretary of Agriculture, Food and Markets, who issued a statement earlier in April saying the state had been given “all As” for its efforts so far, by the Environmental Protection Agency.

The EPA report card, issued in early April, in fact gave Vermont only a “provisional pass” because the state had not yet reached a number of milestones the EPA had set in its pollution reduction order for Lake Champlain. They included long-term funding for clean water as well as plans for treating stormwater runoff in certain cities and towns and from large-area developments.

The EPA issued an order to limit additional phosphorus pollution in Lake Champlain in 2016, following the passage of Act 63, Vermont’s Clean Water Act. To comply with the EPA order, the state must report annually to the EPA on its progress toward achieving the limits, referred to as the Total Maximum Daily Load.

Instead of As the EPA gave the state one year to fulfill three conditions of the federal pollution-reduction order that are currently overdue.

https://vtdigger.org/2018/04/24/vermont-gets-d-poor-progress-toward-lake-champlain-clean/

more....

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Vermont gets a D+ for poor progress toward Lake Champlain clean up By Mike Polhamus Apr 24 2018, 6: (Original Post) George II Apr 2018 OP
This sure reflects badly on the governor and state legislature Fiendish Thingy Apr 2018 #1
These are some of the major reasons for the grade. They are included in the article. NCTraveler Apr 2018 #2
If it's about Vermont, it must be about Bernie Blue_Adept Apr 2018 #3
Isn't that the same treatment Democrats get by R B Garr Apr 2018 #4
"If you're going to use Al Gore as a prop..." Amen to that. NurseJackie Apr 2018 #5
+1000. (nt) ehrnst Apr 2018 #6
Worse. Yeah, clean up your own backyard Cha Apr 2018 #7

Fiendish Thingy

(15,669 posts)
1. This sure reflects badly on the governor and state legislature
Wed Apr 25, 2018, 10:42 AM
Apr 2018

Was there another Vermonter you feel deserves the blame?

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
2. These are some of the major reasons for the grade. They are included in the article.
Wed Apr 25, 2018, 10:57 AM
Apr 2018

F for failing to meet the end-2017 deadline to identify a source of long-term funding.
F for failing to meet another December 2017 deadline, to establish a permit for stormwater runoff from large paved areas, such as parking lots. Not only did the state fail to establish the permit, it sought to weaken the standards for treating water pollution in some parts of the state.
D- for failing to update the existing permit for how certain cities and towns handle stormwater runoff and sewage.
D for completing three months after the deadline regulations governing Required Agricultural Practices, another requirement of the TMDL, and failing to include important protections for the state’s public waters, such as pollution-management plans for farms.
D for failing to establish rules for pipes aiding in subsurface drainage from farm fields.
D for failing to update in a timely fashion an agreement reached by the Agency of Natural Resources and the Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets for managing agricultural runoff.

I don't see anyone specifically called out.

Blue_Adept

(6,402 posts)
3. If it's about Vermont, it must be about Bernie
Wed Apr 25, 2018, 11:01 AM
Apr 2018

Some folks must just feel like they're constantly being attacked or have to go on the offensive for any perceived slight...

R B Garr

(16,993 posts)
4. Isn't that the same treatment Democrats get by
Wed Apr 25, 2018, 11:05 AM
Apr 2018

"another Vermonter"? Everyone is in the bag, no other distinctions necessary.

But this does look out of touch. If you're going to use Al Gore as a prop, might as well check for environmental compliancy in your own state.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
5. "If you're going to use Al Gore as a prop..." Amen to that.
Wed Apr 25, 2018, 05:07 PM
Apr 2018
If you're going to use Al Gore as a prop
Amen to that. I'm so glad to know that I'm not the only person who saw the same thing you did. I have to say, we're much smarter than many give us credit for being.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Vermont gets a D+ for poo...