Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,065 posts)
Sat May 12, 2018, 07:55 PM May 2018

Mueller Is Asking Questions About Trump's Inaugural Fund. There's a Lot to Investigate There.

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/05/mueller-is-asking-questions-about-trumps-inaugural-fund-theres-a-lot-to-investigate-there/

Mueller Is Asking Questions About Trump’s Inaugural Fund. There’s a Lot to Investigate There.
The inaugural committee raised a record-breaking haul with little transparency.

Russ Choma
May. 11, 2018 3:00 PM


Robert Mueller has questioned witnesses about millions of dollars in donations to President Donald Trump’s inaugural committee, according to a new report from ABC News—and that’s likely to be a very deep, dark hole for the special counsel’s team to dig into.

The committee raised a record $107 million in the months between the 2016 election and Trump’s inauguration, but questions have lingered about where all the money came from and what ended up happening to it. While corporations are not allowed to give to political campaigns, inaugurations are a different story, and the inaugural committee picked up at least $45 million from donors that were not people. The source of funds behind at least one donor, a company called BH Group LLC that was set up in Virginia in August 2016, is still unknown. BH Group donated $1 million to the event.

According to ABC, Mueller’s team has questioned several witnesses about donors with connections to Russia, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar. The questions have also focused on at least two additional donors: Len Blavatnik, a Ukrainian-born billionaire who donated heavily to Republicans in the 2016 elections, and Andrew Intrater, the chief executive officer of Columbus Nova, the investment firm with ties to Russian oligarch Viktor Vekselberg that paid Trump’s personal lawyer Michael Cohen $500,000 after the election. Intrater donated $250,000 to the event, and Vekselberg and Intrater attended.

The inaugural committee’s finances have been curious from the start. Prior administrations placed limits on donations in an effort to tamp down accusations of influence buying, but the Trump administration enthusiastically raised money—with no limits. The effort was led by California billionaire Tom Barrack, a longtime friend of Trump, but little is known about how the committee accomplished its record-breaking haul or how it spent its money. Sean Spicer’s insistence aside, the Trump inauguration was not particularly large, and the official events were relatively limited and toned-down in nature. Yet the committee spent nearly all of its total haul. It donated just $5 million to charity, while paying a whopping $57 million to four event-planning companies. The largest beneficiary was a company founded just weeks before the inauguration by a friend of Melania Trump, which was paid $26 million.

A number of VIP guests at the inauguration were treated to lavish perks. As Mother Jones documented shortly after the event, several of Trump’s international business partners attended and were even allowed to speed past crowds and law enforcement in a VIP motorcade down the inaugural parade route.

The inauguration may be a natural place for Mueller to look. Rick Gates—the longtime associate of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort who was indicted by Mueller last year and who pleaded guilty and agreed to cooperate with the investigation—worked closely with Barrack on the event and was paid at least $100,000. The event’s vice chairman was Elliott Broidy, a financier who has become embroiled in several Trump administration-related scandals. Broidy has been named as a client of Cohen, and Broidy admitted to paying a Playboy Playmate $1.6 million after she said he impregnated her. Broidy has also been scrutinized for his business practices, which included marketing himself to foreign governments as a man with access to Trump.
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mueller Is Asking Questions About Trump's Inaugural Fund. There's a Lot to Investigate There. (Original Post) babylonsister May 2018 OP
honestly, the way inaugurations are financed stinks. unblock May 2018 #1
Agreed 100% Doodley May 2018 #2
I thought it was strange Miigwech May 2018 #3
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2018 #4
Yes, that should have been one of the first red flags. kentuck May 2018 #5
K&R Scurrilous May 2018 #6
Rachel has been on this like white on rice malaise May 2018 #7
Something is rotten in the state of Denmark! The level of chicanery RestoreAmerica2020 May 2018 #8
Rachel has spoken of this many times, almost since the beginning. EOM elfin May 2018 #9
Lock Them Up! c-rational May 2018 #10

unblock

(52,227 posts)
1. honestly, the way inaugurations are financed stinks.
Sat May 12, 2018, 08:02 PM
May 2018

we should have a standard inauguration, funded by the government, and anything above that should be regulated at least as tightly as campaign finances are regulated. probably more so.

to my mind, outside contributions, especially above a rather small amount, to an inauguration fund have the appearance of impropriety.

that means that even if you're doing everything on the up-and-up, it still looks bad.


now, in donnie's case, i'd be shocked if he didn't use it as a fairly open bribe opportunity.

 

Miigwech

(3,741 posts)
3. I thought it was strange
Sat May 12, 2018, 08:38 PM
May 2018

At the time, all the reports were that trump's inauguration was underfunded and then all of a sudden he collected multiple times the funds collected by Obama. trump had a pathetic event so where did the money come from and where did it go?

kentuck

(111,095 posts)
5. Yes, that should have been one of the first red flags.
Sat May 12, 2018, 08:51 PM
May 2018

When they announced how much they had raised and how much they had spent, it didn't sound right. Then they announced that Melania's helper had received $26 million dollars for her efforts? Something was very fishy. I think that may have been their first dive into money laundering once they were in the White House? And it has grown exponentially since then, imo.

RestoreAmerica2020

(3,435 posts)
8. Something is rotten in the state of Denmark! The level of chicanery
Sat May 12, 2018, 09:24 PM
May 2018

...surrounding trumpf, his family, staff, advisors reeks of criminal malfeasance. Lock them up!

Likewise, the complicitness of GOP seemingly depicts their involvement, culpability at some level; every member seems paralyzed, Stockholm syndrome perhaps --as if they are held captive, are they being coerced, threatened? It's a bit untoward, isn t it? That they [members of GOP] have all made a concerted effort to turn a blind eye to the level of corruption that has been leveled by trumpf, his administration--a seemingly concerted effort by gopto stand by and do nothing. Something is certainly amiss!


Gotv2018!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mueller Is Asking Questio...