Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,203 posts)
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 08:07 PM Jun 2018

Trump's demand that TBS fire Samantha Bee may violate First Amendment

In a tweet published on Friday morning, President Donald Trump suggested that TBS fire television host Samantha Bee, after the comedian used a vulgar term to describe White House adviser Ivanka Trump, the president’s daughter. But while it’s natural for the president to claim a paternal prerogative in defense of his own children, Trump’s unique position puts him in sketchy waters with regard to the First Amendment.

What’s more, Trump’s claim of a “double standard” in play casts him in a hypocritical light, based upon his own history of wanton vulgarity.

“Why aren’t they firing no talent Samantha Bee for the horrible language used on her low ratings show?” he wrote. “A total double standard but that’s O.K., we are Winning, and will be doing so for a long time to come!”




On Wednesday night, in the opening monologue of her show, Full Frontal, Bee criticized Ivanka for posting a photo of herself with her son at the same time her father was implementing aggressive immigration policies that separated hundreds of thousands of children from their parents at the southern U.S. border.

“Ivanka Trump, who works at the White House, chose to post the second most oblivious tweet we’ve seen this week,” Bee said. “You know, Ivanka, that’s a beautiful photo of you and your child. But let me just say, one mother to another, do something about your dad’s immigration practices, you feckless c—t.”

https://thinkprogress.org/trumps-call-for-tbs-to-fire-samantha-bee-is-hypocritical-5b85b08d7a63/
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's demand that TBS fire Samantha Bee may violate First Amendment (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2018 OP
Trump shows no understanding of or respect for most of the Constitution. Sophia4 Jun 2018 #1
And? Seems everytime he opens his mouth he breaks some law. nt Ferrets are Cool Jun 2018 #2
He can't honor a guy who stopped a shooting ina Waffle House kimbutgar Jun 2018 #3
I disagree. So far, all he's doing now is running his damn fool mouth, a use of words in which mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2018 #4
It may violate 18 usc 227: unblock Jun 2018 #7
No it doesn't onenote Jun 2018 #9
Losers like bullies saidsimplesimon Jun 2018 #5
Roseanne Trump Got Fired.. Grassy Knoll Jun 2018 #6
He also said the same thing about Colin Kaepernick Initech Jun 2018 #8
He could be on to something. mythology Jun 2018 #10
 

Sophia4

(3,515 posts)
1. Trump shows no understanding of or respect for most of the Constitution.
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 08:09 PM
Jun 2018

Plus he is not a good listener so hiring lawyers doesn't help him much.

kimbutgar

(21,193 posts)
3. He can't honor a guy who stopped a shooting ina Waffle House
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 08:30 PM
Jun 2018

But he has time to go after Samatha Bee. Everyday that pile of shit is growing in his brain.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,613 posts)
4. I disagree. So far, all he's doing now is running his damn fool mouth, a use of words in which
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 08:33 PM
Jun 2018

Last edited Sun Jun 3, 2018, 12:27 AM - Edit history (1)

he enjoys Constitutionally-protected rights the same as anyone else.

Now, if he **acts** by, say, calling up someone in the Justice Department to try to get her fired, then we've gone beyond 1A.

Speech or the written word? Fine. Acts? Not so fine.

onenote

(42,762 posts)
9. No it doesn't
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 10:29 PM
Jun 2018

See discussion here. https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=10677907

And the description of what is a "clear cut" violation of 227 in the linked article is anything but a clear cut violation since it lacks the required element of "solely on the basis of partisan political affiliation."


saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)
5. Losers like bullies
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 08:38 PM
Jun 2018

think they are "winning". In reality, their fans will be ready to give a thumbs down at the coliseum when the gladiator fights don't produce enough violence for the serial killer wanabes.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
10. He could be on to something.
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 10:42 PM
Jun 2018

I mean if we got to fire everybody who has ever said a vulgar word towards women, we could get rid of the guy who called Sally Yates that, or the guy who called Jennifer Lin that, or Jessica Leeds, the guy who talked about Megyn Kelly bleeding out of her wherever, talks about women being too unattractive for him to sexually assault, brags about sexually assaulting women, brags about intentionally walking in on underage girls.

I mean if what has so far been a one time thing merits a firing, all of Donald Trump's repeated slurs against women might deserve being fired into space on a one way ticket.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump's demand that TBS f...