Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
Mon Jun 4, 2018, 12:50 PM Jun 2018

Supreme Court rules narrowly for Colorado baker who wouldn't make same-sex wedding cake

The U.S. Supreme Court says the Colorado state panel violated baker's religious rights.
The ruling was 7-2, with 2 liberals joining 5 conservatives

REUTERS Published 2 Hours Ago

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday handed a victory on narrow grounds to a Colorado Christian baker who refused for religious reasons to make a wedding cake for a gay couple, stopping short of setting a major precedent allowing people to claim exemptions from anti-discrimination laws based on religious beliefs.

The justices, in a 7-2 decision, said the Colorado Civil Rights Commission showed an impermissible hostility toward religion when it found that baker Jack Phillips violated the state's anti-discrimination law by rebuffing gay couple David Mullins and Charlie Craig in 2012. The state law bars businesses from refusing service based on race, sex, marital status or sexual orientation.

The ruling concluded that the commission violated Phillips' religious rights under the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment.


https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/04/supreme-court-rules-in-favor-of-colorado-baker-who-refused-to-make-wedding-cake-for-gay-couple-for-religious-reasons.html
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court rules narrowly for Colorado baker who wouldn't make same-sex wedding cake (Original Post) workinclasszero Jun 2018 OP
7-2. Narrowly? Sneederbunk Jun 2018 #1
Yeah...weird workinclasszero Jun 2018 #2
as in it only decided this one case lapfog_1 Jun 2018 #3
Call me stupid angrychair Jun 2018 #4
So if some restaurant refuses to serve "mixed race" couples for religious reasons... hunter Jun 2018 #5
 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
2. Yeah...weird
Mon Jun 4, 2018, 12:53 PM
Jun 2018

Wonder how long until some restaurant owner refuses service to PoC on 'religious' grounds?

lapfog_1

(29,205 posts)
3. as in it only decided this one case
Mon Jun 4, 2018, 12:54 PM
Jun 2018

and is not to be used by lower courts as guidance on other discrimination cases or as precedent for future supreme court decisions.

angrychair

(8,702 posts)
4. Call me stupid
Mon Jun 4, 2018, 01:22 PM
Jun 2018

But I fail to see how being a bigoted asshole is a religious virtue.
“Religion has been used to justify everything from slavery to the holocaust.” This is a true statement.

This will definitely be used to invalidate every anti discrimination law on the books...it completely supports the ideal that religious zealots have a right to spread hate and discriminate all they want.

If my “closely held religious beliefs” is to not hire or rent to PoC or immigrants than this ruling supports that.

I’m open to any sound argument of how I’m wrong.

hunter

(38,317 posts)
5. So if some restaurant refuses to serve "mixed race" couples for religious reasons...
Mon Jun 4, 2018, 01:37 PM
Jun 2018

... because all the dishes they serve are religious art, that's okay?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court rules narro...