General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe #ZeroTolerance policy is NEW!! 4/06/18: "This zero-tolerance policy shall supersede any exis
signed by JS! This is a good tweet to pass around.
The #ZeroTolerance policy is NEW!! 4/06/18: "This zero-tolerance policy shall supersede any existing policies" This comment cements it as Sessions-Trumps-Miller's!! --meaning whatever policy existed prior to this directive is null and void.
Link to tweet
kimbutgar
(21,153 posts)riversedge
(70,232 posts)elleng
(130,914 posts)as most of these families are trying to cross to seek asylum, I thought, and should NOT be subjected to 'Criminal Immigration Enforcement' per 8 U.S.C. 1325(a).
Silver Gaia
(4,544 posts)If so, could you post it? Or post a link to it? Or otherwise direct me to it? I want to read it. Thanks!
elleng
(130,914 posts)Silver Gaia
(4,544 posts)Silver Gaia
(4,544 posts)8 U.S. Code § 1325 - Improper entry by alien
(a) Improper time or place; avoidance of examination or inspection; misrepresentation and concealment of facts
Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.
(b) Improper time or place; civil penaltiesAny alien who is apprehended while entering (or attempting to enter) the United States at a time or place other than as designated by immigration officers shall be subject to a civil penalty of
(1) at least $50 and not more than $250 for each such entry (or attempted entry); or
(2) twice the amount specified in paragraph (1) in the case of an alien who has been previously subject to a civil penalty under this subsection.
Civil penalties under this subsection are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any criminal or other civil penalties that may be imposed.
(c) Marriage fraud
Any individual who knowingly enters into a marriage for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or fined not more than $250,000, or both.
(d) Immigration-related entrepreneurship fraud
Any individual who knowingly establishes a commercial enterprise for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, fined in accordance with title 18, or both.
elleng
(130,914 posts)have not/are not doing so under these terms, but that's just me.
Silver Gaia
(4,544 posts)I think his "zero tolerance" policy means this applies to anyone trying to enter the country at the southern border under any circumstances (particularly if their skin is brown). Period.
elleng
(130,914 posts)I share your
riversedge
(70,232 posts)by Stephen Miller and implemented by Jeff Sessions.
malaise
(269,004 posts)That simple
dhill926
(16,339 posts)shout this out....and keep shouting.....
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)japple
(9,825 posts)assylum. They are not seeking an "illegal goal." They are desperate people who are seeking a better life. Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, your smart changes and updated approach were used by slave holders in the US, were used by the federal govt. in their attemps assimilate Indian children. It is a crime against humanity.
Louis1895
(768 posts)The memorandum only affects those along the southwest border. If you cross over from Canada or into Florida, the order does not apply.
cagefreesoylentgreen
(838 posts)America seems obsessed with punishing people, everyone except the rich.
Cha
(297,244 posts)Silver Gaia
(4,544 posts)downthread someone asks a question I mentioned to my husband yesterday.
Where are the girls?
All I have seen or heard discussed are "detention centers" where boys and babies are being kept.
Where are the girls? Why have we not heard of any of these centers where girls are being kept?
I sincerely hope it's just because the ones we have "found" so far are not facilities for girls, but even so, why isn't someone asking about and demanding to see the places for girls, too?
I am just concerned.
jpak
(41,758 posts)She has no maternal instinct to cloud her judgment on this issue.
Nope