Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 03:45 AM Aug 2012

Federal Election Commission Say Ex-Senator Larry Craig Needs To Narrow His Stance

[font size=3]Ex-Idaho senator: Bathroom trip official business[/font]

SFGate
JOHN MILLER, Associated Press
Updated 7:32 p.m., Friday, August 3, 2012



[font color=gray]FILE - In this March 6, 2012 file photo, former Idaho Sen. Larry Craig, center, chats
with state representative Marv Hagadorn, left, with Rep. Raul Labrador, right, and
his wife Rebecca at the Ada County Republicans caucus on the campus of Boise State
University in Boise, Idaho. MANDATORY CREDIT Photo: The Idaho Statesman, Joe
Jaszewski / AP[/font]


BOISE, Idaho (AP) — Former Republican U.S. Sen. Larry Craig aims to fend off a federal election lawsuit against him by arguing his infamous June 11, 2007, Minneapolis airport bathroom visit that ended in his sex-sting arrest was part of his official Senate business. Craig is hoping to avoid repaying $217,000 in campaign funds the Federal Election Commission claims he misused to defend himself.

The FEC sued Craig in June in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., alleging he converted the campaign money to personal use by spending it on his legal defense after he was accused of soliciting sex in a Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport bathroom. The commission argues Craig's defense had no connection to his campaign for federal office.

Craig counters that money tied to his airport bathroom trip was for neither personal use nor his campaign, but fell under his official, reimbursable duties as senator because he was traveling between Idaho and the nation's capital for work. He cites a U.S. Senate rule in which reimbursable per diem expenses include all charges for meals, lodging, hotel fans, cleaning, pressing of clothing — and bathrooms.

"Not only was the trip itself constitutionally required, but Senate rules sanction reimbursement for any cost relating to a senator's use of a bathroom while on official travel," wrote Andrew Herman, Craig's lawyer in Washington, D.C., in documents filed Thursday.

MORE


- Hmmm, so is he saying he can pay his oral sex-sting lawyer's fees under the meals per diem? Got any proof Senator? A menu??




    ''Sending good people in to reform a state is like sending virgins to reform a whorehouse.'' ~Anonymous
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal Election Commission Say Ex-Senator Larry Craig Needs To Narrow His Stance (Original Post) DeSwiss Aug 2012 OP
a wide stance is what got him in trouble Tribetime Aug 2012 #1
Leave Huckabe ALONE!!! Yeah Its Spin Aug 2012 #2
Larry Craig Needs To Narrow His Stance Kalidurga Aug 2012 #3
Sorry Yeah Its Spin Aug 2012 #4
Using the bathroom to solicit a blowjob constitutes legitimate Senate business? 6000eliot Aug 2012 #5
Has freshman GOP rep Raul Labrador taken a "stance" on this issue? Zambero Aug 2012 #6
 

Yeah Its Spin

(236 posts)
4. Sorry
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 04:11 AM
Aug 2012

BOISE, Idaho (AP) — Former Republican U.S. Sen. Larry Craig aims to fend off a federal election lawsuit against him by arguing his infamous June 11, 2007, Minneapolis airport bathroom visit that ended in his sex-sting arrest was part of his official Senate business. Craig is hoping to avoid repaying $217,000 in campaign funds the Federal Election Commission claims he misused to defend himself.

The FEC sued Craig in June in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., alleging he converted the campaign money to personal use by spending it on his legal defense after he was accused of soliciting sex in a Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport bathroom. The commission argues Craig's defense had no connection to his campaign for federal office.

Craig counters that money tied to his airport bathroom trip was for neither personal use nor his campaign, but fell under his official, reimbursable duties as senator because he was traveling between Idaho and the nation's capital for work. He cites a U.S. Senate rule in which reimbursable per diem expenses include all charges for meals, lodging, hotel fans, cleaning, pressing of clothing — and bathrooms.

"Not only was the trip itself constitutionally required, but Senate rules sanction reimbursement for any cost relating to a senator's use of a bathroom while on official travel," wrote Andrew Herman, Craig's lawyer in Washington, D.C., in documents filed Thursday.

Zambero

(8,965 posts)
6. Has freshman GOP rep Raul Labrador taken a "stance" on this issue?
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 08:34 AM
Aug 2012

That him standing and smiling to the right of Craig. As a so-called "deficit hawk" and "family values" conservative, one might wonder whether Labrador is OK with Craig's plan for retroactively financing his botched sex solicitatioan, along with its legal consequences.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Federal Election Commissi...