Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew development in the Daniels case, via Avenatti.
Michael Avenatti
?Verified account @MichaelAvenatti
The Court just issued this order, ruling that it will decide our motion aimed at lifting the stay in the @StormyDaniels case based on the briefs filed and that no hearing this Thurs. is necessary.
?Verified account @MichaelAvenatti
The Court just issued this order, ruling that it will decide our motion aimed at lifting the stay in the @StormyDaniels case based on the briefs filed and that no hearing this Thurs. is necessary.
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1410 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New development in the Daniels case, via Avenatti. (Original Post)
Miles Archer
Jun 2018
OP
Odd that he didn't mention that the court DID schedule a hearing on the restraining order
jberryhill
Jun 2018
#1
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)1. Odd that he didn't mention that the court DID schedule a hearing on the restraining order
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.704250/gov.uscourts.cacd.704250.61.0_1.pdf
Jun 15, 2018
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge S. James Otero: ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT MICHAEL COHEN'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR RESTRAINING ORDER 60 . This matter is before the Court on Defendant Michael Cohen's Ex Parte Application for Restraining Order ("Application" ), filed June 14, 2018. Defendant has not demonstrated in the Application that immediate, irreparable injury would occur in the absence of emergency ex parte relief. See Mission Power Eng'g Co. v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 883 F. Supp. 488, 492 (C.D. Cal. 1995) (to justify ex parte relief, "the evidence must show that the moving party's cause will be irreparably prejudiced if the underlying motion is heard according to regular noticed motion procedures" ).1 Accordingly, the Court sets the following briefing schedule: opposition due June 25, 2018, reply due July 2, 2018. (lc) (Entered: 06/15/2018)
Jun 15, 2018
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge S. James Otero: ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT MICHAEL COHEN'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR RESTRAINING ORDER 60 . This matter is before the Court on Defendant Michael Cohen's Ex Parte Application for Restraining Order ("Application" ), filed June 14, 2018. Defendant has not demonstrated in the Application that immediate, irreparable injury would occur in the absence of emergency ex parte relief. See Mission Power Eng'g Co. v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 883 F. Supp. 488, 492 (C.D. Cal. 1995) (to justify ex parte relief, "the evidence must show that the moving party's cause will be irreparably prejudiced if the underlying motion is heard according to regular noticed motion procedures" ).1 Accordingly, the Court sets the following briefing schedule: opposition due June 25, 2018, reply due July 2, 2018. (lc) (Entered: 06/15/2018)
manor321
(3,344 posts)2. Dear Judges
Get off your goddamned asses and get moving already. The country can not wait!
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)3. Why can't the country wait for a resolution of this contract lawsuit?
Is there some national interest in whether Stormy Daniels is released from the hush agreement?