Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MelissaB

(16,420 posts)
Wed Jun 20, 2018, 05:58 PM Jun 2018

Iskoff: Obama cyber chief confirms 'stand down' order against Russian cyberattacks in summer 2016

Obama cyber chief confirms 'stand down' order against Russian cyberattacks in summer 2016

Michael Isikoff
Chief Investigative Correspondent,
Yahoo News•June 20, 2018

WASHINGTON — The Obama White House’s chief cyber official testified Wednesday that proposals he was developing to counter Russia’s attack on the U.S. presidential election were put on a “back burner” after he was ordered to “stand down” his efforts in the summer of 2016.

The comments by Michael Daniel, who served as White House “cyber security coordinator” between 2012 and January of last year, provided his first public confirmation of a much-discussed passage in the book, “Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump,” co-written by this reporter and David Corn, that detailed his thwarted efforts to respond to the Russian attack.

They came during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing into how the Obama administration dealt with Russian cyber and information warfare attacks in 2016, an issue that has become one of the more politically sensitive subjects in the panel’s ongoing investigation into Russia’s interference in the U.S. election and any links to the Trump campaign.

The view that the Obama administration failed to adequately piece together intelligence about the Russian campaign and develop a forceful response has clearly gained traction with the intelligence committee. Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., the ranking Democrat on the panel, said in an opening statement that “we were caught flat-footed at the outset and our collective response was inadequate to meet Russia’s escalation.

More: https://www.yahoo.com/news/obama-cyber-chief-confirms-stand-order-russian-cyberattacks-summer-2016-204935758.html
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

MelissaB

(16,420 posts)
1. snip
Wed Jun 20, 2018, 06:00 PM
Jun 2018
Instead, Obama officials chose another course of action after becoming frustrated that Republican leaders on Capitol Hill would not endorse a bipartisan statement condemning Russian interference and fearful that any unilateral action by them would feed then candidate Donald Trump’s claims that the election was rigged. They chose a private “stern” warning by Obama to Russian President Vladimir Putin at a summit in China in early September 2016 to stop his country’s campaign to disrupt the U.S. election.

Squinch

(51,030 posts)
2. Damned if they did, damned if they didn't.
Wed Jun 20, 2018, 06:02 PM
Jun 2018

And the fault is with the Republican leaders who refused to act.

lame54

(35,329 posts)
3. Trump wins again...
Wed Jun 20, 2018, 06:03 PM
Jun 2018

The same reason the FBI talked about Hillary but not Trump was his loud mouth

Freethinker65

(10,069 posts)
6. Yep. Big mistake. McConnell, Chaffetz, Gowdy, Ryan, etc. would have accused Obama of anti-Trump bias
Wed Jun 20, 2018, 06:17 PM
Jun 2018

The GOP would have leaked the action and claimed it was all political. The GOP put party and Trump ahead of country.

If the Obama administration would have acted, Hillary might have won or perhaps lost by more electorally because of damage by the Republican noise machine, but the country and the integrity of our elections might have been better off.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
7. Surely Obama didn't expect anything different from Republican leaders.
Wed Jun 20, 2018, 06:19 PM
Jun 2018

Frustrated, sure. But he couldn't have possibly been expecting a different response. Not after putting up with them for 8 years.

Squinch

(51,030 posts)
13. But their refusal to join him in a bipartisan denouncing of what Russia was doing put him in an
Wed Jun 20, 2018, 07:22 PM
Jun 2018

impossible position. At the time it looked like Hillary would definitely win, and with that assumption, he took the least bad of two bad options.

JI7

(89,279 posts)
8. I can understand Obama's side. The media would frame it as if the issue was
Wed Jun 20, 2018, 06:58 PM
Jun 2018

Obama unfairly helping Clinton.

DeminPennswoods

(15,290 posts)
9. I'll never understand why Obama didn't just go over the Rs
Wed Jun 20, 2018, 07:03 PM
Jun 2018

heads to all Americans in a primetime speech to the country. There was nothing partisan about laying out what Russia was up to to all Americans. In fact, I'd argue it was the President's duty.

DeminPennswoods

(15,290 posts)
11. IMHO, it was a national security situation and that's something
Wed Jun 20, 2018, 07:13 PM
Jun 2018

any President should address to all Americans. He didn't have to mention Clinton or Trump and surely could have crafted non-partisan, just the facts, ma'am language.

We can agree to disagree.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,221 posts)
18. I'm afraid I have to agree with you on this one
Thu Jun 21, 2018, 12:13 PM
Jun 2018

I realize hindsight is 20/20, but I think this was all handled badly going back to 2015. Perhaps Obama was just too confident that Clinton would win by a landslide. I know a lot of us here were. But this goes beyond political affiliation. A foreign power, an adversary, was allowed to interfere with a US election. The public should have been made aware, in 2015, and sanctions should have been made.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Iskoff: Obama cyber chief...