General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIskoff: Obama cyber chief confirms 'stand down' order against Russian cyberattacks in summer 2016
Michael Isikoff
Chief Investigative Correspondent,
Yahoo NewsJune 20, 2018
WASHINGTON The Obama White Houses chief cyber official testified Wednesday that proposals he was developing to counter Russias attack on the U.S. presidential election were put on a back burner after he was ordered to stand down his efforts in the summer of 2016.
The comments by Michael Daniel, who served as White House cyber security coordinator between 2012 and January of last year, provided his first public confirmation of a much-discussed passage in the book, Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putins War on America and the Election of Donald Trump, co-written by this reporter and David Corn, that detailed his thwarted efforts to respond to the Russian attack.
They came during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing into how the Obama administration dealt with Russian cyber and information warfare attacks in 2016, an issue that has become one of the more politically sensitive subjects in the panels ongoing investigation into Russias interference in the U.S. election and any links to the Trump campaign.
The view that the Obama administration failed to adequately piece together intelligence about the Russian campaign and develop a forceful response has clearly gained traction with the intelligence committee. Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., the ranking Democrat on the panel, said in an opening statement that we were caught flat-footed at the outset and our collective response was inadequate to meet Russias escalation.
More: https://www.yahoo.com/news/obama-cyber-chief-confirms-stand-order-russian-cyberattacks-summer-2016-204935758.html
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)Squinch
(51,030 posts)And the fault is with the Republican leaders who refused to act.
bluestarone
(17,067 posts)uponit7771
(90,367 posts)Squinch
(51,030 posts)lame54
(35,329 posts)The same reason the FBI talked about Hillary but not Trump was his loud mouth
Voltaire2
(13,213 posts)Freethinker65
(10,069 posts)The GOP would have leaked the action and claimed it was all political. The GOP put party and Trump ahead of country.
If the Obama administration would have acted, Hillary might have won or perhaps lost by more electorally because of damage by the Republican noise machine, but the country and the integrity of our elections might have been better off.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Frustrated, sure. But he couldn't have possibly been expecting a different response. Not after putting up with them for 8 years.
Squinch
(51,030 posts)impossible position. At the time it looked like Hillary would definitely win, and with that assumption, he took the least bad of two bad options.
uponit7771
(90,367 posts)lunasun
(21,646 posts)JI7
(89,279 posts)Obama unfairly helping Clinton.
DeminPennswoods
(15,290 posts)heads to all Americans in a primetime speech to the country. There was nothing partisan about laying out what Russia was up to to all Americans. In fact, I'd argue it was the President's duty.
JI7
(89,279 posts)DeminPennswoods
(15,290 posts)any President should address to all Americans. He didn't have to mention Clinton or Trump and surely could have crafted non-partisan, just the facts, ma'am language.
We can agree to disagree.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,221 posts)I realize hindsight is 20/20, but I think this was all handled badly going back to 2015. Perhaps Obama was just too confident that Clinton would win by a landslide. I know a lot of us here were. But this goes beyond political affiliation. A foreign power, an adversary, was allowed to interfere with a US election. The public should have been made aware, in 2015, and sanctions should have been made.