Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,996 posts)
Fri Jun 22, 2018, 10:20 AM Jun 2018

Fearing bad PR-WH & EPA tried to suppress "Unsafe drinking water at 126 military bases in US"

Fearing bad PR, the White House and EPA tried to suppress a report that American troops and their families were potentially drinking unsafe drinking water at 126 military bases throughout the U.S.

The Military Drinking-Water Crisis the White House Tried to Hide
A new, previously suppressed report has grave implications for service members, veterans, and their families.
By EMILY ATKIN
June 21, 2018
The Trump administration feared it would be a “public relations nightmare”: a major federal study that concluded contaminated groundwater across the country, especially near military bases, was more toxic than the government realized. Political aides to President Donald Trump and Environmental Protection Agency head Scott Pruitt pressured the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry against releasing the results.


Peace Officers“The public, media, and Congressional reaction to these numbers is going to be huge,” an unidentified White House aide wrote, according to Politico. “The impact to EPA and [the Defense Department] is going to be extremely painful. We cannot seem to get ATSDR to realize the potential public relations nightmare this is going to be.” The study was not released.

That is, until Wednesday. Amid a media firestorm about the administration’s immigration policy, the ATSDR—a division of the Department of Health and Human Services—quietly published its 852-page review of perfluoroalkyls, or PFAS, which are “used in everything from carpets and frying pan coatings to military firefighting foams,” according to ProPublica. “All told, the report offers the most comprehensive gathering of information on the effects of these chemicals today, and suggests they’re far more dangerous than previously thought.”

These chemical compounds pose health risks to millions of Americans. They’re in roughly 1 percent of the nation’s public water supply, according to the EPA; in roughly 1,500 drinking water systems across the country, according to the Environmental Working Group. People who drink from these systems, even if their exposure to PFAS is low, now have a potentially increased risk of cancer; of disruptions in hormones and the immune system; and of complications with fetal development during pregnancy.


https://newrepublic.com/article/149280/military-drinking-water-crisis-white-house-tried-hide

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fearing bad PR-WH & EPA tried to suppress "Unsafe drinking water at 126 military bases in US" (Original Post) kpete Jun 2018 OP
And that's where they want to send babies ???? C_U_L8R Jun 2018 #1
We're Number One, We're Number One!! Ferrets are Cool Jun 2018 #2
Not just that.. Crutchez_CuiBono Jun 2018 #3
Dear Military Personnel gratuitous Jun 2018 #4

Crutchez_CuiBono

(7,725 posts)
3. Not just that..
Fri Jun 22, 2018, 10:37 AM
Jun 2018

Soooo many things we do in the military just get buried somewhere on the base. Combustion w each bullet and shell is just the beginning. Aquifers are being tainted nationwide w fracking et.al. Pruitt sure did'nt order this study. So sorry military folks pay this kind of price and are fed a line of horse poo.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
4. Dear Military Personnel
Fri Jun 22, 2018, 12:19 PM
Jun 2018

This is what Republican governance thinks of you. They won't supply you with safe drinking water, and they'll try to withhold that information from you given half a chance. This is in addition to cutting pay and benefits, and underfunding VA. Next time you go to the polls, think about who's really on your side, and who's responsive to your concerns. Because it sure doesn't look like Republicans give a tin shit about you, despite their high-flown campaign rhetoric.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fearing bad PR-WH & EPA t...