General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump's bad week continues...
In Ruling Against Trump, Judge Defines Anticorruption Clauses in Constitution for First Time
WASHINGTON A lawsuit accusing President Trump of violating the Constitution by maintaining a financial interest in his companys Washington hotel cleared a critical hurdle on Wednesday when a federal judge allowed the case to move forward.
In the first judicial opinion to define how the meaning of the Constitutions anticorruption clauses should apply to a president, Judge Peter J. Messitte of the United States District Court in Greenbelt, Md., said the framers language should be broadly construed as an effort to protect against influence-peddling by state and foreign governments.
He ruled that the lawsuit should proceed to the evidence-gathering stage, which could clear the way for an examination of financial records that the president has consistently refused to disclose. The Justice Department is expected to forestall that by seeking an emergency stay and appealing the ruling.
More at:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/25/us/politics/trump-emoluments-lawsuit.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
JoeOtterbein
(7,702 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,627 posts)Did School House Rock ever make one for this?
Haggis for Breakfast
(6,831 posts)He stood there at the lectern and (when challenged about divesting himself of his many business conflicts) said "Make me."
Okay . . . if you insist.