General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTSA mulls a plan to eliminate security checkpoints at 150 smaller airports
Security checkpoints would be eliminated at more than 150 smaller U.S. airports under a plan being considered by the Transportation Security Administration. Passengers would instead be screened when they arrived at larger airports after their initial flight.
The idea was first floated by the TSA two years ago and was seen then by critics as a transparent effort to get Congress to spend additional money on the agency.
This is completely nuts, said Mary Schiavo, former inspector general of the U.S. Department of Transportation and an aviation expert. Perhaps they want an outcry from the public to say Oh, no, no, no, Congress, give them the additional $115 million that they say this would save.
Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Todays most popular stories on The Washington Post
The proposal raises questions about whether would-be terrorists could penetrate the nations air system at the airports lacking screening or commander smaller shuttle aircraft and use them to damage buildings or other infrastructure.
In September 2001, two hijackers began their travels in Portland, Maine, in an effort to escape notice. Mohamed Atta and Abdulaziz al-Omari flew on a commuter plane to Boston, where they boarded an American Airlines Boeing 767, took control of the jet in flight and crashed it into tower 102 of the World Trade Center, causing the deaths of more than 1,600 people on Sept. 11.
The TSA said no decision has been made on the plan.
There has been no decision to eliminate passenger screening at any federalized U.S. airport, TSA spokesman Michael Bilello said in a statement. Every year as part of the federal budget process TSA is asked to discuss potential operational efficiencies this year is no different.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/news/tsa-mulls-a-plan-to-eliminate-security-checkpoints-at-150-smaller-airports/ar-BBLnzwk?li=BBnbfcL&ocid=mailsignout
DFW
(54,436 posts)The local airport here, the Provincetown Municipal Airport, is so tiny, the largest plane it can accommodate a 7 seat twin engine Cessna. You could crash one of those into a McDonald's and not damage the Fries maker.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)DFW
(54,436 posts)Many European airports have security-free arrival areas for flights from places where they deem security to be adequate, and other arrival areas--with security for all arriving passengers--for flights where they deem security to be inadequate (or non-existent). Logan has all Cape Air flights come in at one location, so it wouldn't be difficult to set up one single security area for their arriving passengers (or have them arrive outside regular security altogether). Probably a lot cheaper than maintaining six security guards plus scanning equipment at P-town, Hyannis, Nantucket, Bar Harbor and Martha's Vineyard.
ProfessorGAC
(65,150 posts)I looked at 4 articles and the associated links. I could only find the list of 22 airports that already allow private security (including my favorite little airport in Key West). But, the TSA page specifically says the screening required by these private firms meets the standards of TSA screened facilities.
I'm just wondering which airports are being considered.
fescuerescue
(4,448 posts)But I think this is the wrong move.
One of the very few nice things about TSA, is that once you get into the system, you are done with those idiots and my stress level can go down.
To fly for awhile, then have to go through security at the HUB.....where it seems more often than not I'm already in a rush to catch a connection because my flight leg was late....ugh.
Plus due to inefficient trip routing, reroutes, rebookings etc....this will mean that sometimes you have to go through TSA security multiple times on occasion.