Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Aug 6, 2018, 09:31 AM Aug 2018

Should media quit covering Trump rallies? Absolutely not


Trump rallies are important aspects of the news cycle, but journalists need to be more strategic in covering them

AMANDA MARCOTTE
AUGUST 6, 2018 12:00PM (UTC)

Donald Trump is upping his rally schedule dramatically. There's a thin pretext that these rallies are about bolstering Republicans in the midterm campaigns, but even the more cowardly media outlets seem to have given up the farce of pretending that Trump, who can barely be bothered to mention the candidates he's allegedly supporting, is doing this for any other reason than old-fashioned Goebbels-style propaganda. And, of course, feeding the narcissism vampire's endless appetite for attention. As CNN reported, aides are trying to cram more rallies in, "partly to boost Trump's mood and distract him from the headlines about Russia."

Because of this, an idea is starting to bubble up on the left, boosted by social media, that the press needs to stop covering Trump rallies. The rallies have no purpose other than spreading lies and whipping up the masses, the thinking goes, so by covering them, the press is being a handmaiden to propaganda. To make it worse, Trump has been putting the journalists who attend on display, and encouraging the audience to heap vitriol and threats in a two-minute hate designed to sow even more hatred towards the media and turn conservatives audiences increasingly towards conspiracy theories like QAnon.




But journalists are pushing back, arguing that it's their duty to cover the news, and that these rallies put a spotlight on a very real and troubling shift towards extremism in America that needs to be documented. Many reporters feel that these liberal pressure campaigns are based on the false notion that ignoring a problem makes it go away, and instead believe that sunlight is the best disinfectant.

This is one of those situations that are hard to discuss in our overly emotional, nuance-free times, because both sides have a point. On one hand, we are witnessing a terrible moment in American history, the rise of a bona-fide white nationalist and perhaps fascist movement that sees these rallies as a flashpoint. That fact needs to be documented. On the other hand, it's also true that Trump is trying to exploit the mainstream media for propaganda purposes, and that journalists should resist being used in this way.

It's also true that the media tendency to simply run the cameras on every Trump rally or event in 2016, while refusing to give Hillary Clinton anything close to equal coverage, was an invaluable contribution to the Trump campaign that led to the horror show we're in now, and that mistake should not be repeated.

more
https://www.salon.com/2018/08/06/should-media-quit-covering-trump-rallies-absolutely-not/
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

lark

(23,134 posts)
1. I think not covering it live on tv is the answer.
Mon Aug 6, 2018, 09:43 AM
Aug 2018

But they should be there, tape him from a safe protected place and show us the madness but not the advertisements for himself and don't let him have the danger and spectacle of the crowd going after the press because they are an easy target. Realize he always hires actors/actresses to attend his rallies and act out, so what we are seeing may or may not be real.

kcr

(15,318 posts)
4. That's what a lot of people on the left are actually saying
Mon Aug 6, 2018, 10:13 AM
Aug 2018

but it gets reduced to "stop covering it" because nuance? What is that? I like Amanda Marcotte but sometimes even she does the very thing she mentions in the article. Live coverage absent meaningful analysis was propping up Trump and liberals were going to call that shit out. It's disappointing to see her with this take on it.

ProfessorGAC

(65,111 posts)
6. Spot On!
Mon Aug 6, 2018, 10:24 AM
Aug 2018

A reporter (or plural) can covering it and describe the activities. But, showing them on live TV is a totally different issue.

The author is comparing apples to oranges.

LonePirate

(13,427 posts)
2. Allow the press to cover them but without the use of television cameras.
Mon Aug 6, 2018, 09:44 AM
Aug 2018

The crowds and 45 are reacting to them more so than the actual reporters.

Johonny

(20,864 posts)
5. They need to stop showing his speech
Mon Aug 6, 2018, 10:14 AM
Aug 2018

and instead show the people outside the rally. Show their hate, ignorance and anti-Americanism...

Mc Mike

(9,114 posts)
7. Then we should push for reporters to get security escorts and combat pay, from the big
Mon Aug 6, 2018, 11:09 AM
Aug 2018

Last edited Tue Aug 7, 2018, 08:52 AM - Edit history (1)

profitable media companies.

Frankly, if all the non-'freak nazi' media stopped covering his garbage, by saying 'he said he doesn't like us and doesn't want us there', he and his team would be screaming and crying about how little (or zero) coverage they were getting from US media.

He's got it flipped, media doesn't need him, he needs media. No matter what corporate shills like Moonves say. Sneak unknown operatives with camera phones into his events, then all the big networks can have their press pool reporters on as guests, to tear shitler and his fans apart, with the covert footage that had been obtained.

Runningdawg

(4,522 posts)
8. Time to cover them undercover
Mon Aug 6, 2018, 11:17 AM
Aug 2018

No more livestock pens. Buy a ticket, walk right in. NO journalists faces shown or names known.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
10. "That fact (fascist tendencies in the Trump administration) needs to be documented"
Mon Aug 6, 2018, 11:26 AM
Aug 2018

It has. Numerous times. But it's still treated as an aberration by most of the popular media. As if by not calling out instance after instance, somehow the Trump administration will revert to a more traditional position that we recognize as more or less business as usual.

It's not going to happen. What you're seeing, Amanda Marcotte, is what the Trump administration is. The evidence is plentiful. We're way past more likely than not; the preponderance of evidence isn't even in the rear-view mirror; clear and convincing evidence is a speck in the far distances, and we blew past reasonable doubt months ago.

There is no reason for the popular media to cover Trump's fascist rallies live.

procon

(15,805 posts)
11. Cover it, but just use pool reporters and don't live stream Trump's lounge act
Mon Aug 6, 2018, 12:34 PM
Aug 2018

as if he was making headline worthy news. Then the TV and press people could fact check Trump's lies and only air snippets from the worst of the worst of his rambling, stream of consciousness rants.

Trump's whole schtick against the press requires a useful foil, a straight man for him to play against so his zingers have a target that incites the crowd. His routine collapses without the top tier journalists that cover his staged barn burners, and he can't play like he's the poor victim if there are only a couple of unknown pool reporters.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should media quit coverin...