General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJuly 12 2017 exonerates trump
Hannity on radio hands that to fox news
Fox running with this is old news and nothing new that trump has already admitted meeting was to get dirt on Hillary.
Nevilledog
(51,157 posts)Watchfoxheadexplodes
(3,496 posts)He stated meeting was about dirt.
Nevilledog
(51,157 posts)Were his statements walked back?. What did SHS say about it?
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,026 posts)First excerpt from near the end where he contradicts what he said earlier:
On Don Jr, POTUS was asked if as a father he supported Don Jr. being willing to testify.
"I think if he wants to," Trump said. He mentioned that h had seen something about her being in congress recently talking to members. "She had meetings with various people. So it's the same thing."
He said the press had been unfair and said of the meeting that "they talked about the adoption stuff which was actually a big thing at the time but nothing happened." He addd, "In fact maybe it was mentioned at some point," but then when asked if he had been told that it was about Hillary Clinton and dirt against her he said no.
Earlier statement:
THE PRESIDENT: Don is -- as many of you know Don -- he's a good boy. He's a good kid. And he had a meeting, nothing happened with the meeting. It was a short meeting as he told me -- because I only heard about it two or three days ago.
As he told me, the meeting went -- and it was attended by a couple of other people who -- one of them left after a few minutes -- which is Jared. The other one was playing with his iPhone. Don listened, out of politeness, and realized it wasn't . . . .
Honestly, in a world of politics, most people are going to take that meeting. If somebody called and said, hey -- and you're a Democrat -- and by the way, they have taken them -- hey, I have really some information on Donald Trump. You're running against Donald Trump. Can I see you? I mean, how many people are not going to take the meeting?
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Isn't it funny how the Fox hive mind works? Hillary Clinton can have an unblemished run in public life, be subjected to countless investigations, sit for innumerable hours of hearings and questions, and yet Fox ominously declares that questions linger and clouds continue to gather.
But Trump? Oh, he's innocent of everything all the time, until the second he confesses to yet another crime. Then they flyspeck every past conflicting pronouncement, regardless of whether it's been walked back or "clarified" by some lackey, and declare Trump's latest crime to be old news. Years from now, historians will argue whether the commentators of Fox believed anything they were saying, but the fact will remain that Fox intimately knows its target audience, and what flavor of bullshit they'll swallow with a smile.
malaise
(269,103 posts)Fux is ReTHUG Central.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)fox newspeople sick of having to dance around traitortrump's latest collusion admission. So fox needs something new.
So, fox has a new hero. One 'C. Nixon'! Nixon is on tape, exuberantly shouting to a crowd,
'CONSERVATIVES ARE GOING TO CALL US SOCIALISTS ANYWAY. LET'S SHOW THEM WHAT A REAL SOCIALIST IS!'
[As you might guess, a fox panel loved that tape, and played around it to no end].
This is not good, forward thinking, winning performance for November.