Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,082 posts)
Sat Aug 11, 2018, 07:45 PM Aug 2018

GOPus delendus est

https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2018/08/nos-victi-reipublicae/

GOPus delendus est
Kevin Drum
Aug. 9, 2018 1:21 PM


By chance I’ve gotten a couple of similar questions lately. Don’t I agree, asked a friend, that Democrats should give Brett Kavenaugh an honest chance at confirmation to the Supreme Court? We liberals believe in fair play, after all. This was followed by another friend suggesting that liberals shouldn’t actively defend Sarah Jeong’s mocking anti-white trollery on Twitter from a few year ago. That was some pretty illiberal stuff she said.

Well, let’s talk about this. For many decades the Republican Party built its brand by appealing to white Southerners who had left the Democratic Party after the Civil Rights Era. However, the GOP’s appeal to whites inevitably became more muted as times changed and overt racism became less and less acceptable. Finally, when Mitt Romney lost in 2012, the party wrote a post-mortem that admitted they’d taken things as far as they could. The white vote was tapped out, and if they wanted to get to 51 percent in the future they needed to dial back on the racial appeals and instead learn how to attract Asians and Hispanics who were natural constituencies for a fiscally conservative, church-friendly party.

I cheered. But only for a few days. A year earlier the party had fired its first black chairman, and in 2012 they tossed their post-mortem into the dustbin almost as soon as the ink was dry. Then it nominated Donald Trump for president on a platform so viciously racist and bigoted it was like watching an old Ken Burns documentary. The entire party quickly fell in line behind Trump, whose entire campaign was based on his disdain for (wink wink) “political correctness.” Two years later the GOP—including most of the original never-Trumpers—is even more solidly behind him: Mexicans are rapists; there are good people on both sides of Charlottesville; Obama was born in Kenya; Democrats love MS13; we need to prevent Muslims from entering the country; parents and children should be separated at the border; Southern secession was just like 1776; all’s fair in efforts to prevent blacks from voting; and white nationalists are to be coddled, not ridden out of town on a rail.

So this is where we are. The Republican Party can’t win using ordinary methods. On the process side, they can win only by inflating the white vote via gerrymandering, cracked-and-packed districts, and ruthless black voter suppression. On the policy side, they can win only with heavy dollops of strident and outright bigotry against Mexicans, Muslims, blacks, Hispanics, Chinese, and anyone else who comes along. Even Canadians will do in a pinch.

Today, the Republican Party exists for one and only one purpose: to pass tax cuts for the rich and regulatory rollbacks for corporations. They accomplish this using one and only method: unapologetically racist and bigoted appeals to win the votes of the heartland riff-raff they otherwise treat as mere money machines for their endless mail-order cons.


Like it or not, this is the modern Republican Party. It no longer serves any legitimate purpose. It needs to be crushed and the earth salted behind it, while a new conservative party rises to take its place. This new party should be conservative; brash; ruthless when it needs to be; as simpleminded as any major party usually is; and absolutely dedicated to making Democrats look like idiots. There should be no holds barred except for one: no appeals to racism. None. Not loud ones, not subtle ones. Whatever else it is, it should be a conservative party genuinely open to any person of any color.

When that happens, I will change my mind about how we should fight the Republican Party. Until then, no, I don’t think Brett Kavanaugh deserves any help from Democrats and I don’t think liberals should waste any time tut-tutting over Twitter mockery from 2013 that all of us know perfectly well doesn’t represent any genuine anti-white sentiment.

GOPus delendus est. That’s it. Whatever works best, I’m in.

********************************

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOPus delendus est (Original Post) babylonsister Aug 2018 OP
I agree. Honeycombe8 Aug 2018 #1
Doesn't she agree that Kavanaugh should release his financial records, including tax returns, pnwmom Aug 2018 #2
Seems he lied to Congress for seat on Appellate Court. annabanana Aug 2018 #3
Something not to forget. Or let your Senators forget, either. calimary Aug 2018 #5
Two words Haggis for Breakfast Aug 2018 #4

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
1. I agree.
Sat Aug 11, 2018, 10:22 PM
Aug 2018

And if you knew how honest, ethical, and straight laced I am. Everything above board. If you knew, you'd realize how much it takes to get me to agree to going low, if necessary.

But if going low is needed, that's what needs to be done. Sad but true. And I'm in with both feet & enthusiasm. No looking back.

The Republican Party doesn't exist, any more. It's now the Trump Party. I believe we're on the edge of becoming Germany in the 1930s...all out fascism, with Russia participating in our government (I think it already is). There's too much at sake. Trump and the Trumpers in Congress have taken this to an historical level. We must act.

We must be bold, passionate, persistent, loud, angry, repetitive, say it like it is, call it for what it is.

pnwmom

(108,991 posts)
2. Doesn't she agree that Kavanaugh should release his financial records, including tax returns,
Sat Aug 11, 2018, 10:27 PM
Aug 2018

and other paper records that the Democrats have been asking for?

Why should the Democrats consider a nominee who is refusing to be transparent?

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
3. Seems he lied to Congress for seat on Appellate Court.
Sat Aug 11, 2018, 10:37 PM
Aug 2018

Inquiries were sent, never answered (11 years).

He had claimed he had nothing to do with any legal discussion about "enhanced interrogation techniques" at his confirmation hearing. Evidence to the contrary had surfaced some time ago.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GOPus delendus est