Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump's 2-page W.H. NDA prohibits "disclosing confidential info in any form including books"
Kyle Griffin
?
Verified account
@kylegriffin1
Embedded in the W.H.'s two-page NDA is clause that prohibited top aides from disclosing confidential info in any form including books, without the express permission of the president.
If aides violated the terms, they would have to forfeit royalties.
?
Verified account
@kylegriffin1
Embedded in the W.H.'s two-page NDA is clause that prohibited top aides from disclosing confidential info in any form including books, without the express permission of the president.
If aides violated the terms, they would have to forfeit royalties.
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 871 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's 2-page W.H. NDA prohibits "disclosing confidential info in any form including books" (Original Post)
Miles Archer
Aug 2018
OP
Since the NDAs are unenforceable, I hope everybody who's ever left that cesspool
The Velveteen Ocelot
Aug 2018
#3
If Trump wants to sue Omarosa on the basis of that unenforceable NDA, he can try...
RockRaven
Aug 2018
#6
Freethinker65
(10,021 posts)1. Wait, they work for the US Government not Trump, Inc.
So any royalties, if enforceable, would go back to the taxpayers?
The NDAs cannot be constitutional.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,693 posts)4. NDAs can't be required of federal employees and are unenforceable.
Girard442
(6,072 posts)2. Might as well swear an oath to the Fuhrer and be done with it.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,693 posts)3. Since the NDAs are unenforceable, I hope everybody who's ever left that cesspool
for any reason feels emboldened to speak out.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)5. Already been established that NDA's for White House positions are invalid.
Let Shitler stew on it.
RockRaven
(14,967 posts)6. If Trump wants to sue Omarosa on the basis of that unenforceable NDA, he can try...
But the discovery phase in that lawsuit is going to be a doozy. He'll back down like he always does, for the same reason he always does -- to avoid discovery.
Those NDAs are meant to intimidate the people who sign them into not exercising the rights they still have -- b/c they're unenforceable. Also to raise the cost of exercising those rights by having to retain/consult with lawyers.
Turbineguy
(37,331 posts)7. Their word should be as good as
his.