Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Look like WH legal action is admission Omarosa is telling the truth. (Original Post) Kingofalldems Aug 2018 OP
He thought he could use her to show he had support from African-Americans vlyons Aug 2018 #1
Omarosa's legal team will immediately challenge the validity of the NDA VMA131Marine Aug 2018 #2
Thanks, that's good to hear. OnDoutside Aug 2018 #7
This will be hilarious C_U_L8R Aug 2018 #3
There is information out there that says NDA's are illegal pennylane100 Aug 2018 #4
But, she wasn't a Public Employee when she signed it. maxsolomon Aug 2018 #5
Rest assured that her attorneys have a clear understanding... Bonhomme Richard Aug 2018 #6

vlyons

(10,252 posts)
1. He thought he could use her to show he had support from African-Americans
Tue Aug 14, 2018, 12:58 PM
Aug 2018

and all the time, she was using him. She probably went into the WH to write a tell-all book.

VMA131Marine

(4,139 posts)
2. Omarosa's legal team will immediately challenge the validity of the NDA
Tue Aug 14, 2018, 01:02 PM
Aug 2018

Presuming that it will be ruled null and void, this would open up a huge can of worms for the WH since it would free every former staffer from their NDA's. Fart's lawyers may feel they have no choice, since to do nothing would be the same as having no NDA at all, but this is likely to end badly for the WH. They would have a much better case against Omarosa by going after her for security violations.

pennylane100

(3,425 posts)
4. There is information out there that says NDA's are illegal
Tue Aug 14, 2018, 01:26 PM
Aug 2018

Public employees can’t be gagged by private agreements. These so-called NDAs are unconstitutional and unenforceable. https://t.co/IyYqScsESu

— ACLU (@ACLU) March 19, 2018
https://lawandcrime.com/opinion/if-omarosa-really-did-sign-a-non-disclosure-agreement-its-probably-illegal/

I hope this is true if this case eventually goes to court.

maxsolomon

(33,345 posts)
5. But, she wasn't a Public Employee when she signed it.
Tue Aug 14, 2018, 01:58 PM
Aug 2018

She was a Trump Campaign employee.

Enforceable up to 1/20/17 and not thereafter? Covers all activities and knowledge up to that point?

I don't know jack about NDAs except that they scare the fuck out of people who sign them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Look like WH legal action...