Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Freedom of the Press Is Yours
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/08/the-freedom-of-the-press-is-yours/567655/The Freedom of the Press Is Yours
It is your right as an American to read what you will, to write what you think, and to publish what you believe.
The Editors
Aug 15, 2018
The press, says the 45th president of the United States, is very dangerous & sick. It causes great division & distrust. It is the enemy of the people.
Every presidentstarting with George Washington, who griped about his treatment at the hands of infamous scribblershas felt maligned or misunderstood by the media. The rhetoric now emanating from the White Houseremarkable in its ferocity, irresponsibility, and remorselessnessrepresents something darker. It is an attack not just on individual media outlets, but on the role journalism serves in a free society; not just on specific stories, but on the need for Americans to know the facts; not just on journalists, but on the right of all people to speak their minds.
The press in the days of the Founders was avowedly partisanits stories frequently scurrilous, its language entirely unrestrained, and its members generally disreputable. James Madison understood all of this with painful clarity when he rose before Congress in 1789 and proposed an amendment to the newly ratified Constitution: The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their sentiments, he offered, and the freedom of the press, as one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable.
The legislators who ratified those rights within the First Amendment harbored no illusions as to what they were protecting. But they saw the press as Madison didas an expression of the inviolable freedom of the people to publish their sentiments. They did not extend a conditional liberty, contingent on good behavior; instead, they recognized a basic right, worth preserving despite missteps, mistakes, and excesses.
The freedom of the press is an individual liberty, not the peculiar privilege of a profession or an industry. It is your right as an American to read what you will, to write what you think, and to publish what you believe. The press is neither the enemy of the people nor its ally, but rather its possession. That is why attacks on the press, one of the great bulwarks of liberty, seek to abridge or deprive the people of their rights, as Madison would have put it to his colleagues.
We know where attacks on the media can lead. When politicians have questioned the rights and legitimacy of the press, violence has frequently followed. The Alien and Sedition Acts, passed in 1798, saw editors jailed for criticizing the president. Pro-slavery mobs attacked some 20 abolitionist newspapers over the decades that followed, destroying their offices, dumping their presses into the river, and beatingor, in one case, killingtheir editors.
That was the backdrop against which The Atlantic was created in 1857, in defiance of that violence, in defense of the right of a free people to criticize injustice where they see it. The Atlantics founders promised that it would be the organ of no party or clique, and that it would deal frankly with persons and with partiesvalues that we stand by today. This is why we now feel compelled to speak outalongside hundreds of other publicationsin defense of this essential freedom.
The presidents rhetoric doesnt merely spread division and distrust; it is dangerous, and sick. Like all Americans, he has a right to critique the press. But he is also sworn to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitutionand this is what he must do.
Every presidentstarting with George Washington, who griped about his treatment at the hands of infamous scribblershas felt maligned or misunderstood by the media. The rhetoric now emanating from the White Houseremarkable in its ferocity, irresponsibility, and remorselessnessrepresents something darker. It is an attack not just on individual media outlets, but on the role journalism serves in a free society; not just on specific stories, but on the need for Americans to know the facts; not just on journalists, but on the right of all people to speak their minds.
The press in the days of the Founders was avowedly partisanits stories frequently scurrilous, its language entirely unrestrained, and its members generally disreputable. James Madison understood all of this with painful clarity when he rose before Congress in 1789 and proposed an amendment to the newly ratified Constitution: The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their sentiments, he offered, and the freedom of the press, as one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable.
The legislators who ratified those rights within the First Amendment harbored no illusions as to what they were protecting. But they saw the press as Madison didas an expression of the inviolable freedom of the people to publish their sentiments. They did not extend a conditional liberty, contingent on good behavior; instead, they recognized a basic right, worth preserving despite missteps, mistakes, and excesses.
The freedom of the press is an individual liberty, not the peculiar privilege of a profession or an industry. It is your right as an American to read what you will, to write what you think, and to publish what you believe. The press is neither the enemy of the people nor its ally, but rather its possession. That is why attacks on the press, one of the great bulwarks of liberty, seek to abridge or deprive the people of their rights, as Madison would have put it to his colleagues.
We know where attacks on the media can lead. When politicians have questioned the rights and legitimacy of the press, violence has frequently followed. The Alien and Sedition Acts, passed in 1798, saw editors jailed for criticizing the president. Pro-slavery mobs attacked some 20 abolitionist newspapers over the decades that followed, destroying their offices, dumping their presses into the river, and beatingor, in one case, killingtheir editors.
That was the backdrop against which The Atlantic was created in 1857, in defiance of that violence, in defense of the right of a free people to criticize injustice where they see it. The Atlantics founders promised that it would be the organ of no party or clique, and that it would deal frankly with persons and with partiesvalues that we stand by today. This is why we now feel compelled to speak outalongside hundreds of other publicationsin defense of this essential freedom.
The presidents rhetoric doesnt merely spread division and distrust; it is dangerous, and sick. Like all Americans, he has a right to critique the press. But he is also sworn to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitutionand this is what he must do.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 510 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post