General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWatching Twitter for WH & RW-pundit reaction to McRaven's challenge. So far, nada.
At least from official WH spokespersons and pundits I've heard of. Some RWers saying McRaven is simply wrong about Brennan.
Editing to add a link to what McRaaven wrote, published in the Washington Post today:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/revoke-my-security-clearance-too-mr-president/2018/08/16/8b149b02-a178-11e8-93e3-24d1703d2a7a_story.html
Apologies to those who didn't know the context of this tweet, but there were already multiple threads about his challenge to Trump here in GD.
_____
Editing again. Judging by a post a few minutes ago from Trump troll Jack Posobiec
Link to tweet
and a few other Trump supporters who've commented on this so far, the "response" to what McRaven said will be that he served under Obama.
He also served under Carter, Reagan, George HW Bush, Clinton, and George W Bush.
But to these dimwits, simply saying that he served under Obama is proof of irrational malice toward Trump.
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
Bernardo de La Paz This message was self-deleted by its author.
highplainsdem
(48,978 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)highplainsdem
(48,978 posts)threads here about this, it was recent enough that I should have provided some context.
Va Lefty
(6,252 posts)Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)Huh?
spanone
(135,833 posts)Adm. McRaven: Revoke my security clearance, too, Mr. President
https://www.sfgate.com/opinion/article/Revoke-my-security-clearance-too-Mr-President-13161566.php
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)Big salute to all those with courage to stand up against the rampant KGOP republican fascism being overseen by a dishonorable republican shirker & grifter & traitor.
highplainsdem
(48,978 posts)highplainsdem
(48,978 posts)and that McRaven served under Obama (and every other US president since 1977), is enough to discredit his challenge to Trump.
highplainsdem
(48,978 posts)Link to tweet
Some imaginative replies there...and at least one person showing him Posibiec's tweet, the one I added to the OP minutes ago, dismissing McRaven just because he served under President Obama as well as other presidents.