General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsQueens newspaper points out the irony of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez banning them
from her local town-hall events, even though she's been going around the country giving interviews with national MSM, and they feel they gave her good coverage when she was the underdog.
This Queens newspaper was the first to report how local news reporters were banned from her PUBLIC event. Lost in the shuffle has been the point that these local reporters are her constituents, also.
Also, while they weren't allowed to report, non-reporters were tweeting and sending out other social media photos and accounts of the event. So much for privacy.
And what was to prevent some ICE person from showing up to this public event, and taking pictures or even arresting someone? If they are so concerned about this issue, they should have a closed, not a public event. All that does is keep out legitimate reporters while still allowing ICE in.
The bottom line: in this new era of "the press is the enemy of the people," no Democrats should ever imply that the press isn't part of the public or doesn't represent the public. But any candidate can have a private or closed event. That's always an option.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
http://www.qchron.com/opinion/editorial/aoc-must-deal-with-press/article_882eed8d-4056-5f74-88ca-f5e7185717b5.html?platform=hootsuite
The Democratic nominee for Congress in the 14th District and virtually guaranteed winner because she has no real opponent Ocasio-Cortez held the event as part of a listening tour around the district she will represent. At a prior event in the Bronx, she was mobbed by reporters even though her campaign had told the media there would be no question-and-answer period and no one-on-one interviews, her team said. Hence the barring of the press from both another event in the Bronx and the one here. Also, they wanted residents to be able to speak their minds without the distraction of reporters and cameras. But, they said, these were the first of AOCs events the press was barred from, and that will not become the norm.
Were going to hold her to that. Ocasio-Cortez has been granting interviews to major media outlets nationwide since becoming a progressive Democratic star, and she should not forget the Queens press once elected especially the paper that gave her run more and better coverage than any other here when she was seen as the underdog.
http://www.qchron.com/editions/queenswide/ocasio-cortez-bans-press-from-town-hall/article_e59fba26-ddd9-559a-af62-e11dd76e1191.html
At some point during the meeting, according to the social media feeds of attendees, Ocasio-Cortez got up and addressed the audience. . . .
Other social media users in attendance said that topics such as affordable housing, charter schools and Borough President Melinda Katzs interest in the building of a soccer stadium were discussed.
The way we organize around electoral campaigns is the way we need to organize around issue campaigns when Congress is in session, Ocasio-Cortez said.
jrthin
(4,836 posts)tonedevil
(3,022 posts)jrthin
(4,836 posts)Cha
(297,382 posts)A good ol local newspaper.. Not a "rw source" reporting on AOC banning the press from her public event.. as some continue to insist.
Irony indeed.. thank you for the report, pnwmom
mopinko
(70,150 posts)i dont think the press needs to be allowed at every fucking event.
i agree she shouldnt make it a habit, but i think this is much ado about nothing.
we need to learn to resist the bait.
Cha
(297,382 posts)seen "gaslighting" and this ain't it.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)You don't throw out some bullshit about not wanting photos - when anyone in the audience can and apparently DID post photos.
You don't keep the press out of public events.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)dishonest press for YEARS. By not actually addressing that fact, We ceded the reality that the media is shaped dramatically by big money interests to a buffoon who has simply capitalized on a kernel of truth and turned it against the modest amount of honest reporting that we have out there. They always take something that actually happens and then pretend that its democrats who are the culprit .
The reality is big corporate media is a problem and doesn't automatically by virtue of being called the press represent the interest of truth or the people. Yeah we need it desperately, but we need honest independent journalism and that's not always what we get. Instead we have to hope that enough people with powerful media outlets under their belt don't like trump or at least believe in a system of laws.
That said, Trump is trying to set an incredibly dangerous precedent and I think for obvious reasons Ocasio-Cortez and her team should have known this accidental alignment was not going to play well, even if their reasons seemed justified. But I refuse to make the media the martyrs of their own failure. They were absolutely horrible on their coverage of Trump through his primaries, and frankly, of all republicans, as they always are. They helped to make this monster and now they're crying foul?
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)Alexandria during her whole campaign was shut out, and instead, the event was Tweeted out and Instagrammed out and Facebooked out by attendees with cell phones.
And any ICE person could have attended and brought his own cell.
So any "at risk" constituents weren't any safer, and Alexandria seemed to align herself with those who have been calling the free press the enemy of the people.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)isn't true. Again, we need it, but I will not be reflexive in my defense of it. I will not turn it into a saintly institution without its warts and sick underbelly just because Trump has outright waged war with truth and reporting.
that said, I think that unless there is something I don't understand, the decision of Cortez and her campaign to ban the media was a misguided one, and one that absolutely should have raised eyebrows and gotten pushback, but there's reasonable pushback and then there's utter self-fellating, which I think that statement I responded to fit into.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)that passage. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)I just didn't want her implying that there the press wasn't part of the public and didn't represent the public.
Cha
(297,382 posts)paper.
The paper was giving her good press before this happened.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)something she was quoting from the article. Thanks for correcting me on that one.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... and finding out that you're in over your head. All this could have been avoided with experience or experienced handlers/organizers.
All I'm saying is that this could have ended less than 24 hours after the fact with a simple admission of error, apology, and assurances of having learned from the mistake. It's a newbie mistake to think that aggressively doubling-down actually solves anything.