Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI refuse to believe that Maggie Haberman is this clueless. It's possible, I just refuse to believe.
Maggie Haberman
?
Verified account
@maggieNYT
Trump folks are worried about impeachment more than before. The thinking goes like this: this is something tangible, not a theoretical. And it didn't come from Mueller. Does not mean it will happen, but this has moved to a different stage in their minds.
4:15 PM - 21 Aug 2018
?
Verified account
@maggieNYT
Trump folks are worried about impeachment more than before. The thinking goes like this: this is something tangible, not a theoretical. And it didn't come from Mueller. Does not mean it will happen, but this has moved to a different stage in their minds.
4:15 PM - 21 Aug 2018
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1582 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I refuse to believe that Maggie Haberman is this clueless. It's possible, I just refuse to believe. (Original Post)
Miles Archer
Aug 2018
OP
still_one
(92,219 posts)1. I'm not
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)2. I don't get your point
What is the problem with what she said?
elleng
(130,973 posts)6. Neither do I.
Lindsay
(3,276 posts)3. Maggie is a faithful
stenographer taking dictation from the WH.
IMO, anyway. (And I know I'm not alone in that.)
Mike Nelson
(9,959 posts)4. To Maggie Haberman:
your tweet should appeal to your sources.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)5. Maggie's a "Trump folk" as far as I'm concerned.
And November is coming.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)7. I don't even understand the tweet. How can people be mad at nothing ?
C_U_L8R
(45,003 posts)8. And I have a second stomach just for dessert
I believe Maggie's reporting... that Republicans will believe anything.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)9. I watched her when she came onto MSNBC.
At that time she worked for an online political blog site. I think that it was before she got hired by the NY Times. Even then, she was very cautious about making big, obvious pronouncements, even when information implied that she should. It seems her style is to understate things.