Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,034 posts)
Sun Sep 2, 2018, 12:52 AM Sep 2018

Ten years later: Wounds run deep from 2008 crash

Ten years have passed since the depths of the 2008 financial crisis and the U.S. has emerged as a more prosperous but less equal nation.

The bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers and government takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in September 2008 set off a series of collapses that froze the global financial system and triggered a massive recession.

Millions of Americans would lose their homes to foreclosure and their jobs to the contracting economy. The devastation helped fuel the election of former President Obama, who enacted sweeping new rules for banks and a massive stimulus package over the opposition of Republicans.

A decade later, joblessness is close to all-time lows, corporations and banks are boasting record profits, and consumer spending has gradually risen as the economy expands. But the wounds still run deep for millions of Americans who haven't felt the full benefits of the recovery.

Inflation-adjusted wages have sunk despite the hot job market, rising housing costs have locked out many first-time homebuyers, and the working class has struggled to overcome the growing chasm between the richest and poorest Americans.

Analysts say scores of new federal rules accomplished their goal of stabilizing the financial system, allowing the U.S. to rebuild after the crisis. Even so, there are growing concerns that the economy they helped create poses new, less familiar risks to American consumers.

“Did the rules make us safer or just different? I think it’s just different,” said Federal Financial Analytics managing partner Karen Petrou. “If you look at the financial system, it’s considerably more fragile.”

http://thehill.com/policy/finance/404653-ten-years-later-wounds-run-deep-from-2008-crash

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ten years later: Wounds run deep from 2008 crash (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 2018 OP
We bailed them out so they could keep pissing on us. dchill Sep 2018 #1
republicans stealing from the poor to enrich the rich Achilleaze Sep 2018 #10
Fasten your chin straps because the redumbliCONS are taking US back to 2008 or worse. democratisphere Sep 2018 #2
I've never understood why everyone says 2008. KentuckyWoman Sep 2018 #3
I was a paralegal at a small, three attorney law firm PoindexterOglethorpe Sep 2018 #4
Considerably more fragile? That would be this society top-heavy with vast income-wealth inequality. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2018 #5
They stole my home. I went from normal life to poverty. nt joet67 Sep 2018 #6
Another crash is coming soon, we're already 10 years overdue for one ansible Sep 2018 #7
reverse robin hood Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2018 #8
i'll never recover financially KG Sep 2018 #9
Same here. GoCubsGo Sep 2018 #12
We're on our way there again RhodeIslandOne Sep 2018 #11

democratisphere

(17,235 posts)
2. Fasten your chin straps because the redumbliCONS are taking US back to 2008 or worse.
Sun Sep 2, 2018, 01:06 AM
Sep 2018

The wealthiest need ALL of the wealth.

KentuckyWoman

(6,687 posts)
3. I've never understood why everyone says 2008.
Sun Sep 2, 2018, 01:18 AM
Sep 2018

yes some of the shenanigans came to light in 2008, but panic started in 2006. I was doing taxes for very affluent people (mostly low end millionaire small business types). The were all moving money around like crazy in 2006 and incorporating if they hadn't already so all the debts would shift to the business.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,862 posts)
4. I was a paralegal at a small, three attorney law firm
Sun Sep 2, 2018, 02:13 AM
Sep 2018

that did foreclosures among other things. They were not connected with any of the big banks or finance companies, but it was very clear by the end of 2006 that the housing market was in deep doo-doo. It was so frustrating to see people who absolutely should have known better, make truly dumb decisions about buying a house. And it's not as though this is the first time something like that has happened. In the late 80's it was "creative financing" that screwed people.

My husband and I were in the market to buy a home in 1988. The first one we signed a contract on involved a balloon payment some five years down the road. We decided we weren't comfortable with that. Yeah, he had a decent and stable job in IT, but who knew what things would be like in five years. So we went back to our realtor and told her we wanted out. We said we understood we'd probably lose the earnest money, but we were prepared for that. She actually re-sold that home in about two weeks, and for a higher amount that we'd agreed to. We got the earnest money back. Then bought a house that we could afford and felt much better about it.

I also recall in the mid-70s when people were having trouble buying because the banks just didn't have the money to lend. And if they did have the money, they didn't want to include a wife's income in calculating what they could afford.

These things are cyclical. Housing prices took a big hit in 2008 and in many places have only recently recovered. I well recall the dot-com bubble of the late 90s. And so on.

I think a huge problem is that history is not well taught in our schools, the news media operates in a vacuum, almost never referring to what came before, or explaining how something got this way, and economics is not taught at all in high school, and most college students never take an econ course. So our collective ignorance is vast.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,005 posts)
5. Considerably more fragile? That would be this society top-heavy with vast income-wealth inequality.
Sun Sep 2, 2018, 02:38 AM
Sep 2018

Such inequality historically does not last for extended periods, especially if it is increasingly split by actions like the tRump tax giveaway.

 

ansible

(1,718 posts)
7. Another crash is coming soon, we're already 10 years overdue for one
Sun Sep 2, 2018, 03:43 AM
Sep 2018

One of my relatives works with real estate and she says everyone's just waiting for the next one to come hitting back soon.

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,349 posts)
8. reverse robin hood
Sun Sep 2, 2018, 03:52 AM
Sep 2018

The Republicans rob from those who work and give to those who manipulate (and feed the campaign chests). Simplification of the tax code is newspeak for lower the ceiling so more ultra rich can escape taxes that the middle class has to pay. Examining entitlements is a kinder, gentler way of shredding the social safety net, while sending the leftover proceeds over the top of that ceiling to those who need it least, and making sure that those who fail to be as productive as expected will quickly fall into an economic dungeon, lose any ability to afford the wealth care system, and disappear from notice. Deregulation makes certain that those above the taxation ceiling will suffer little interference from society while devising more creative, and quite likely destructive, ways to further exploit the increasingly powerless and desperate worker drones below that ceiling. Parasites continue until the host dies.

Naturally, after Democrats revive the host yet again, they will be blamed for the diseases brought on by the parasites.

How long before voters stop voting to be trickled on?

 

RhodeIslandOne

(5,042 posts)
11. We're on our way there again
Sun Sep 2, 2018, 09:07 AM
Sep 2018

And as usual the adults will have to do the hard work while the GOP crooks skate....

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ten years later: Wounds r...