Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsConclusion of Mueller investigation could become beginning of fight over Rosenstein releasing report
If the negotiations over a voluntary interview fail, as now seems likely, Mueller may decide to subpoena the President. Giuliani has weighed in on the legality of Presidential subpoenas in the past. In 1997, a unanimous Supreme Court ruled that President Clinton was legally obligated to submit to a deposition in Paula Joness sexual-harassment case against him. As the special prosecutor Kenneth Starrs investigation of Clinton intensified, the following year, Charlie Rose put the question to Giuliani in an interview: Would the President have to obey a grand-jury subpoena for his testimony? Hes gotta do it. He doesnt have a choice, Giuliani responded. Under the criminal law, everyone should be treated the same. He added, As far as the criminal law is concerned, the President is a citizen.
Then as now, Giulianis answer reflected the conventional wisdom. The courts had determined that a President could be required to testify in civil cases such as the Jones case and would likely come to the same conclusion about criminal investigations, which are generally viewed as having greater societal import. But after Giuliani became Trumps lawyer he began arguing that the pressing duties of the Presidency rendered him immune from a subpoena. When journalists confronted Giuliani with his statement from 1998, he didnt say that he had changed his mind or that his earlier position was incorrect. Instead, he claimed that his statements were about documents rather than Presidential testimony, despite clear video evidence to the contrary.
Even if the question of Presidential testimony is resolved, Giulianis attacks on the investigation are likely to continue. Mueller will file a concluding report with Rod Rosenstein, the Deputy Attorney General, at the end of the investigation, and, in theory, Rosenstein has the option of releasing the report to Congress and to the public. But Giuliani pointed out a little-known aspect of the agreement that Trumps original legal team struck with Mueller: the White House reserved the right to object to the public disclosure of information that might be covered by executive privilege. I asked Giuliani if he thought the White House would raise objections. Im sure we will, he said, adding that the President would make the final call. In other words, the conclusion of the special counsels investigation could be the beginning of a contentious fight over whether Rosenstein is allowed to release a complete version of Muellers report.
Giulianis team is also preëmptively preparing a report to be released at the same time as Muellers, to refute its expected findings. Giuliani said that this counter-report is already forty-five pages and will likely grow, adding, It needs a five-page summaryfor me.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/09/10/how-rudy-giuliani-turned-into-trumps-clown
Then as now, Giulianis answer reflected the conventional wisdom. The courts had determined that a President could be required to testify in civil cases such as the Jones case and would likely come to the same conclusion about criminal investigations, which are generally viewed as having greater societal import. But after Giuliani became Trumps lawyer he began arguing that the pressing duties of the Presidency rendered him immune from a subpoena. When journalists confronted Giuliani with his statement from 1998, he didnt say that he had changed his mind or that his earlier position was incorrect. Instead, he claimed that his statements were about documents rather than Presidential testimony, despite clear video evidence to the contrary.
Even if the question of Presidential testimony is resolved, Giulianis attacks on the investigation are likely to continue. Mueller will file a concluding report with Rod Rosenstein, the Deputy Attorney General, at the end of the investigation, and, in theory, Rosenstein has the option of releasing the report to Congress and to the public. But Giuliani pointed out a little-known aspect of the agreement that Trumps original legal team struck with Mueller: the White House reserved the right to object to the public disclosure of information that might be covered by executive privilege. I asked Giuliani if he thought the White House would raise objections. Im sure we will, he said, adding that the President would make the final call. In other words, the conclusion of the special counsels investigation could be the beginning of a contentious fight over whether Rosenstein is allowed to release a complete version of Muellers report.
Giulianis team is also preëmptively preparing a report to be released at the same time as Muellers, to refute its expected findings. Giuliani said that this counter-report is already forty-five pages and will likely grow, adding, It needs a five-page summaryfor me.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/09/10/how-rudy-giuliani-turned-into-trumps-clown
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 818 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Conclusion of Mueller investigation could become beginning of fight over Rosenstein releasing report (Original Post)
Miles Archer
Sep 2018
OP
Giuliani is not the arbiter about indicting the president. Idgaf what he says about the subject.
onecaliberal
Sep 2018
#1
onecaliberal
(32,902 posts)1. Giuliani is not the arbiter about indicting the president. Idgaf what he says about the subject.
Bluepinky
(2,276 posts)2. This just gets worse and worse.
Trump and his cohorts are like a cancer thats getting bigger, despite chemotherapy treatments. The patient is in severe distress and may not survive. The disease is overwhelming the patient.
C_U_L8R
(45,021 posts)3. This is not how innocent people behave