Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWP Blog: "It is worth noting that this is a shockingly inexperienced ticket."
Third, I dont think it will doom the campaign or anything like that, but it is worth noting that this is a shockingly inexperienced ticket, especially when it comes to national security and foreign policy. Dan Drezner wrote about Ryan and foreign policy back in the spring, and its worth looking at, but there really isnt much there, I dont think. Governors almost always pick someone with serious foreign policy or national security credentials, and one would think that would be particularly true with the nation still at war. The only ticket I can think of that was similarly lacking in foreign policy credentials would be Carter-Mondale in 1976, but at least both of them had military service in their backgrounds.
The bottom line about virtually all vice-presidential picks is that they seem far more important to the campaign when theyre made than they turn out to be. Thats probably true for this one, too. But if it does end up having a significant effect in November, its almost certainly going to be on the downside, and thats more likely with Ryan than it would have been with most of the other reported finalists.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/post/ryan-a-high-risk-low-reward-pick/2012/08/11/03af8e34-e378-11e1-89f7-76e23a982d06_blog.htm
The bottom line about virtually all vice-presidential picks is that they seem far more important to the campaign when theyre made than they turn out to be. Thats probably true for this one, too. But if it does end up having a significant effect in November, its almost certainly going to be on the downside, and thats more likely with Ryan than it would have been with most of the other reported finalists.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/post/ryan-a-high-risk-low-reward-pick/2012/08/11/03af8e34-e378-11e1-89f7-76e23a982d06_blog.htm
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1271 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WP Blog: "It is worth noting that this is a shockingly inexperienced ticket." (Original Post)
BeyondGeography
Aug 2012
OP
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)1. true, McCain could argue he had the cred while Palin was ignoramus
but neither one of these guys has any world stage experience, and that trip to our biggest ally now shines tragically bright (and horribly clear) that experience is THE one thing that is critical when the world is a dangerous place.
The GOP just lost their Ace in the hole which they played for decades
dkf
(37,305 posts)3. ANYBODY would be better than McCain for foreign policy.
Geez the man is trying to get us into Syria. Incredibly stupid and dangerous.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)2. Aw c'mon... foreign policy is easy
Just threaten anyone who bothers us.
And just threaten some people who don't bother us every now and then, just to keep them on their toes.
Bomb something somewhere every now and then.
Simple.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)4. The Dumb and Dumber ticket