General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJohn Kerry on Maddow talking about facts.
And Republicans having alternative facts.
That's all well and good but it reminds me of battles being fought where one side is too slow to realize the rules have changed.
Quick hint: The rules have changed. That doesn't mean we should not be the party of facts, its just that it isn't what the war is about anymore.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,013 posts)I haven't been watching and won't be able to watch. But you point is excellent.
Eko
(7,326 posts)That the republicans skirt the law at best and don't follow any precedents even ones they set and scream about. Except for tax cuts, deregulation and making the rich richer everything they claim to be is false. The party of Veterans, law and order, against the deficit, smaller government, freedom, economy, its all false and is proven every time for a while now. I mean come on now, the president is saying that the doj is wrong in prosecuting people because they are republicans. And most of that party is quiet about it at least anyone who matters. That's what it is. That's where we are at. 5 years ago I would not be too surprised to hear that about an eastern bloc country, now it is my country I hear that about.
Bluepinky
(2,275 posts)It makes me appreciate them both even more.
Donald Trump doesnt seem to have buddies from his high school years that can vouch for him. He was probably widely despised, and it was before he could pay people for their loyalty and attention.
Eko
(7,326 posts)Interesting how decorated Vietnam vets are standing up to dump lately even in death.
Bluepinky
(2,275 posts)Kerry and Mueller are both quiet, thoughtful and intelligent men who served with honor. Trump is a loud, arrogant buffoon who chose to let others fight in his place.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)I think Democrats should have this debate, but my point is that no policy platform is going to win three or four consecutive national elections for Democrats because we know policy isnt what decides elections; thats not how most voters make decisions.
So there are no policy changes that are going to reverse the overall trajectory that this society is on right now. We have to address some of the structural barriers to progressive power in this country, and we need to take those things as seriously as we do the policy fights within the party.
WERE IN THE MIDST OF A SLOW-MOTION UNRAVELING OF DEMOCRACY IN THIS COUNTRY
Sean Illing
I definitely want to get into some of these structural barriers, but lets be clear about this point youre making. A lot of people still think theres some meaningful connection between policy outcomes and voter decisions, but theres a good bit of political science research to suggest thats just a fantasy.
David Faris
Right. People just dont seem to make the connection between policies and the party in power.
So, for example, the Democrats passed Obamacare and gave millions of people heath care, and yet tons of people who benefited from it have no idea what it is or how they benefited. And its like that with a lot of policies voters simply dont connect the dots, and so they reward or punish the wrong party.
I think the idea that were going to deliver these benefits to people and theyre going to be like, Thank you Jesus, thank you for everything that youve done, let me return you with a larger majority next time, is just nonsense. Its the wrong way to think about politics.
That doesnt mean we shouldnt do things for people, but weve got to be serious about how elections are won. And theyre not being won on the basis of policy proposals or policy wins.
Sean Illing
In the book, you say that Democrats are engaged in policy fights and Republicans are waging a procedural war. What does that mean?
David Faris
The Constitution is a shockingly short document, and it turns out that its extremely vague on some key procedures that we rely on to help government function at a basic level. For the government to work, cooperation between parties is needed. But when that cooperation is withdrawn, it creates chaos.
Since the 90s, when Newt Gingrich took over Congress, weve seen a one-sided escalation in which Republicans exploit the vagueness or lack of clarity in the Constitution in order to press their advantage in a variety of arenas from voter ID laws to gerrymandering to behavioral norms in the Congress and Senate.
Sean Illing
What the Republicans did to Merrick Garland was one of the most egregious examples Ive ever seen.
David Faris
Right. They essentially stole a seat on the Supreme Court a swing seat, no less. But they correctly argued that they had no clear constitutional obligation to consider the presidents nominee for the seat. They didnt violate the Constitution. They violated the spirit of the Constitution. They violated the norms that have allowed these institutions to function normally for years and years.
This is the sort of maneuvering and procedural warfare Im talking about, and the Republicans have been escalating it for two decades. And theyve managed to entrench their power through these dubious procedures.
The result is that the structural environment is biased against Democrats and the Republicans have engineered it that way.
Beartracks
(12,816 posts)"I dont think we can restore order by respecting rules that are not respected by Republicans. I do believe well have to find a way to end this procedural war at some point, but now is not that time. Republicans need to know what its like to be on the other end of normative violations. The Republicans are behaving like a party that believes it will never be held accountable for anything theyre doing, and so far they havent been.
That has to change before we can fix this mess. "
Bluepinky
(2,275 posts)The spirit of the Constitution was violated by not allowing Merrick Garland a hearing and a vote. And theyre doing it again with Kavanaugh, by hiding some of the documents and rushing the process.
Its like the Repubs are the schoolyard bullies, so they get to control everything.