every 7-11 and other convenience stores across the country. If it is just the pills, then why not?

We might need to set up an underground supply chain for morning after pills, chemical abortion, and grant money so poorer women can travel to whichever states keep it legal.

several articles about it. If RvW is truly overturned, there WILL be alternatives, more alternatives than we had back in the 50's and 60's. The problem has always been those crazy laws that make clinics run through so many hoops that they have to close.

fuck those dudes.
hard.

Hypocrites, all of them.

to be on the hook financially for the first eighteen years of the child's life. Even if it was just a one night stand. That might change their tune. So many of these republican men are such disgusting hypocrites.

by employers for birth control for their employees but is fine with Viagra being paid for 100% by all health insur.

Barefoot and pregnant...oh, goodie

too lazy or uninspired to vote in 2016......

What were you thinking?

I am at a loss when it comes to explaining those fools.

What were you thinking?

The wider point is that this has been coming for a long time, and being disengaged from what's going on, is why all these advances are now under threat. Maybe this needed to happen for a massive backlash from ordinary decent Americans, who were busy getting on with their lives. At least we hope there is going to a massive backlash.

I probably should have clarified.
Women, especially those of child bearing age, have a specific, unmistakable dog in this fight, more than men. They should know a GOP win would lead to this and turn out accordingly.

If you think men don't have a stake in ending unwanted pregnancies, you are wrong.

We all have a stake in reducing unwanted pregnancies but I believe pregnant women have the most to directly lose. That said, why don't we ever discuss the monetary costs to society of adding millions of unwanted children -they're staggering.

Don't wait for others to do it.

You-know-who. They are more complicit than those who didnt vote.

people so lacking in insight that they have no idea what they've done. I'm tired of being afraid. It could have been so incredibly different. It's trauma from 2016, no doubt. I don't trust people who claim goals and values to vote them.

As for Roe v. Wade, we still have a chance. Trump's blabbed that he chose Gorsuch and Kavanaugh to criminalize abortion and said that women "will have to be punished." If people learn enough that Collins and Murkowski's can't maintain "plausible deniability" that they know what is intended...

there will be women in the streets like this country has never seen before. Massive marches on Washington and every state capitol.

did i think my daughters would still be fighting this shit.
but here we are. the monsters have come out of the closet we thought we had nailed shut.

what could happen if Trump goes down, but Pence stays and becomes president... with Kavanaugh on the SC. Republic of Gilead?

If Roe v Wade is overturned, my book club will begin running a safe, underground abortion clinic. We are health care professional, empty nesters who marched in Washington on January 21st. If Kavanfraud gets confirmed we start ordering supplies. We have been discussing this for a year and a half and are deadly serious. We will never go back.

Wouldn't the modern way be making sure "morning after" drugs are cheap and readily available?
A "Book Club " clinic seems so 1950's a response?

and as illegal as cocaine.
There are many reasons why esp. young women do not have access to them even today.

Anything which causes CaliforniaPeggy to post an OP in DU:GD is an abomination to Nature and Man!

I don't know why the pro-choice groups don't use this argument.

I also have no idea why the pro-choice groups don't use it.

to give up a baby after birth if she didn't want it, during her pregnancy she is compelled to not have any alcohol, cigarettes, drugs, and not perform certain activities, like horseback riding. She is compelled to eat a certain way, take vitamins, have invasive procedures done, etc. A woman really is a slave to a fetus during pregnancy.

And we will, under better circumstances (or after we pack the court) I would like to see our case argued under the 13th amendment rather than the “right to privacy.” And if we ever got the ERA, Sen. Harris’ question will make our point - “how exactly does the government control a man’s body?”

And these Republican Plantationists (both religiously and politically) are even determined to eliminate women's right/access to birth control.

you take away her control over her life. This is what they want. Taking away our vote is the end game, but too many people think they will never go that far.

Think they'll ever learn? "They" being the alpha male types who stomp around this planet thinking they are superior while our species stands on an ecological brink. This is super old but I love it.



Oh look, it's an old white guy.

It usually is.

Women in self help groups were practicing menstrual extractions before Roe.

But there will still be many women who will fall through the cracks.

Over the internet that weren’t available back in the day.
My fear is for women in wanted pregnancies with fetuses that are diagnosed with problems, fatal or even not fatal but would have a poor quality of life. Or adverse results of genetic testing including Downs. This is normally diagnosed too late for a medical abortion. It’s unbelievably inhumane to force her to give birth against her will in any case. Women should consider an underground network providing transportation and funds to legal states (if there are any).

A lot can get covered, but many women, still, will not have access.

That we have to even think about that again. That men think they have the right to control our bodies AT ALL.
I have a young granddaughter, and if I’m still here when she’s of childbearing age I will let her know that I will drive her to Canada or do whatever I can if she's in a situation needing to end a pregnancy.

and exercise control over women. It's vile.

If Kavanaugh is confirmed, some state with a heavily reactionary legislature would immediately draw up and enact some Draconian anti-abortion-rights measure so awful, a legal challenge is inevitable. It fast-tracks to the Supreme Court, where the Republican Male Catholic Mafia Majority upholds the new statute and overturns Roe v.Wade. Shares of companies that manufacture coat hangers jump 15% the next day. The European Union puts a temporary hold on accepting new refugees from Asia and Africa, in order to handle the sudden influx of refugee seekers from the United States.

But something like that (minus the end, which is too fantastic to be realistic! ) would most likely happen.

This outcome is almost too dreadful to contemplate.

You'll know for sure that the tide has reversed in earnest.

Conservatives have adopted an anti-Roe-v.-Wade agenda to secure the support, not only of Republican Catholics, but also of 'born-again' Protestants, almost all of whom are Republicans. It seems likely that Kavanaugh will be confirmed, which will ensure a long-term Conservative stranglehold on the Supreme Court. Roe v. Wade will probably be overturned. How's that for a shitty scenario?

Exclusive dogmatic male right wing Catholics. Might as well be a chapter of Opus Dei. Come to think of it, that may not be as far-fetched as it was intended to be. Unfortunately. This is quickly turning into the century of the control freak, which we had hoped went out with the demise of Mussolini, Hitler, Stalin, Nixon, Franco and Mao. Now they want Tomás de Torquemada on the Supreme Court.

from the USA. This would require a really creative interpretation of the Constitution. We could also expect a ruling that burning a heretic at the stake is not cruel and unusual punishment.

The thought of Kavanaugh, Thomas, Alito, Roberts and Gorsuch inventing a constitutional precedent for removing Ginsburg, Kagan and Breyer from the Court byforce is no longer one I find inconceivable.

It's about 40 percent of men and 40 percent of women who hold that position.

How do they plan to handle all of these unwanted children? There won't be enough families who will want to adopt, what are they going to do with the overflow? Too many of these women will be unable to afford to take care of another baby. Are they going to subsidize them? I think we all know the answer to that. As usual, they are short-sighted and cruel. They don't care what will happen to the mother and live babies, they just want to punish women for having sex.