General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRestoration of 15th century sculptures leaves Virgin Mary with eyeliner and pink lipstick
A Spanish shop owner has been accused of an 'aberration' after an amateur restoration of three 15th century sculptures which included eyeliner and pink lipstick for the Virgin Mary. Maria Luisa Menendez, one of only 16 inhabitants in the tiny village of Ranadoiro in the northern province of Asturias, is said to have produced the eye-catching result with the permission of local priest Arturo Garcia.
The Virgin Mary ended up with turquoise green hair in one of the three sculptures and Baby Jesus with a look which has been compared to a Playmobil figure.
Maria Luisa, who has received support from her neighbours, hit back on Friday by insisting she had simply used colours she liked for the facelift and claimed they were horrible before she transformed them. She told a local paper: 'I'm not a professional but they were horrible and I wanted to paint them to make them look better.
I had the priest's permission. I painted them in the colours that took my fancy, that was all.'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6142399/Botched-restoration-15th-century-sculptures-leaves-Virgin-Mary-eyeliner-lipstick.html
Zoonart
(11,879 posts)FIrstly, the turquoise green is the Virgin Mary's mantle and not hair. Secondly it is an oft used technique of artists to underline the eye in black to make the eye appear more open.... not just a make-up technique. The color palette seems culturally appropriate and I don't really see the problem in this work, with the exception of the destruction of historical integrity in painting a 15th century wooden sculpture. THAT is the travesty... not the color palette. Just MHO.
I'm trying to figure out why on earth they thought it was a good idea to paint the statues in the first place. They were beautiful. Yes, definitely a travesty.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)They still are in many places. This is not out of place, really. It just seems to be, because we're not used to seeing such polychrome colors today. Here's an 18th-century Madonna and child:
And here's one from the 15th century:
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)The Genealogist
(4,723 posts)Often in what we would see as garish colors.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)It's interesting to visit Catholic churches in Mexico and South America, where that tradition continues.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)The brushstrokes, the colors, the paint (ground up pigments not plastic day-glo acrylics) indicate the skill level of the artisans who painted these. The woman's art looks like that of the person who painted this rock.
.webp
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)sculpture as it appeared just after being painted. I'm not that old. I've seen some pretty garish polychrome work in churches in Mexico, though.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)The examples you have shown are technically so superior to this woman's work that there is no comparison. The works you posted as a point of comparison did not start out looking like her restoration. Good grief.
This is a better comparison!
dalton99a
(81,590 posts)https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/06/26/second-spanish-church-hit-botched-restoration-job/
Botched restoration job leaves church's 16th-century St George sculpture 'looking like Walt Disney cartoon'
But the well-meaning restoration efforts of a local handicrafts teacher have left the 500-year old carving in Estella, Navarre, looking more like a cartoon character, attracting global dismay and bringing back bad memories for the Spanish cultural authorities of another church art botch job that caught the world's attention: the restoration of Ecce Homo, a religious mural in Borja in 2012, that left Christ looking rather more like a monkey than the saviour.
The "unfortunate" restoration of St George at the Romanesque church of San Miguel de Estella was conducted without consultation, according to the town's mayor Koldo Leoz. An arts-and-crafts workshop company called Karmacolor undertook the work at the behest of the local priest, apparently then handing the job to the local teacher.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)Odds are that the colors were much brighter when it was first painted. We shouldn't apply our current preferences to historical artworks. Now, the colors used on the figures in question may not represent the colors of that time, but we can't see the actual colors any longer as they appeared in the 15th century, when wood sculptures used in churches were almost universally painted in polychrome colors.
Our preference for natural wood is a much more recent development.
Response to left-of-center2012 (Original post)
MineralMan This message was self-deleted by its author.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)sinkingfeeling
(51,474 posts)15th. Century art.