indicates to me that you can't tell the difference between political speech and bribery. Which makes me suspicious you have accepted bribes -- if your confusion has led you to make false positives, I'm gonna assume your confusion also allowed false negatives.

Time to vote her out. Obviously woman rights was just for not.

And it's no different that what big-money donors do without a whimper from her.

People fund opponents of politicians all the time. The fact that one group is making a hinge point of funding an opponent if she votes in an inappropriate way, isn't blackmailing her.

Is it a threat against her cushy, run essentially unopposed gig? Sure.

But, it's not extortion. It's just a warning.

I do agree that big money donors do this all the time, but usually that actually is a bribe, because they providing campaign funds directly to the person, in exchange for favorable legislation. That's a bribe.

This isn't and i don't think the consequence rise to blackmail. The possibility she would still win exists, so they're not threatening her job. They are, however, weakening the easy path to it.

Refreshing, even.