Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Threat of Tribalism
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/10/the-threat-of-tribalism/568342/Editors Note: This article is part of a series that attempts to answer the question: Is democracy dying?
Living in a society that was already diverse and pluralistic, Gordon Wood wrote in The Radicalism of the American Revolution, the founding generation realized that the attachments uniting Americans could not be the traditional ethnic, religious, and tribal loyalties of the Old World. Instead, as Abraham Lincoln put it, reverence for the Constitution and Laws was to be Americas political religion. Americans were to be united through a new kind of patriotismconstitutional patriotismbased on ideals enshrined in their founding document.
The dark underside of that document, of course, was racism. Alone among modern Western democracies, the United States maintained extensive race-based slavery within its borders, and the Constitution protected that institution. Only after the cataclysm of the Civil War was the Constitution amended to establish that Americas national identity was as neutral racially and ethnically as it was religiously. With the postwar amendments, the Constitution abolished slavery, established birthright citizenship, guaranteed equal protection under the law, and barred racial discrimination in voting.
...
When we think of tribalism, we tend to focus on the primal pull of race, religion, or ethnicity. But partisan political loyalties can become tribal too. When they do, they can be as destructive as any other allegiance. The Founders understood this. In 1780, John Adams wrote that the greatest political evil to be feared under a democratic constitution was the emergence of two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. George Washington, in his farewell address, described the spirit of party as democracys worst enemy. It agitates the Community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection.
For all their fears of partisanship, the Founders failed to prevent the rise of parties, and indeed, its hard to imagine modern representative democracy without multiparty electoral competition. They were right to be apprehensive, as is all too clear when you look at the current state of Americas political institutions, which are breaking down under the strain of partisan divisions.
Living in a society that was already diverse and pluralistic, Gordon Wood wrote in The Radicalism of the American Revolution, the founding generation realized that the attachments uniting Americans could not be the traditional ethnic, religious, and tribal loyalties of the Old World. Instead, as Abraham Lincoln put it, reverence for the Constitution and Laws was to be Americas political religion. Americans were to be united through a new kind of patriotismconstitutional patriotismbased on ideals enshrined in their founding document.
The dark underside of that document, of course, was racism. Alone among modern Western democracies, the United States maintained extensive race-based slavery within its borders, and the Constitution protected that institution. Only after the cataclysm of the Civil War was the Constitution amended to establish that Americas national identity was as neutral racially and ethnically as it was religiously. With the postwar amendments, the Constitution abolished slavery, established birthright citizenship, guaranteed equal protection under the law, and barred racial discrimination in voting.
...
When we think of tribalism, we tend to focus on the primal pull of race, religion, or ethnicity. But partisan political loyalties can become tribal too. When they do, they can be as destructive as any other allegiance. The Founders understood this. In 1780, John Adams wrote that the greatest political evil to be feared under a democratic constitution was the emergence of two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. George Washington, in his farewell address, described the spirit of party as democracys worst enemy. It agitates the Community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection.
For all their fears of partisanship, the Founders failed to prevent the rise of parties, and indeed, its hard to imagine modern representative democracy without multiparty electoral competition. They were right to be apprehensive, as is all too clear when you look at the current state of Americas political institutions, which are breaking down under the strain of partisan divisions.
Sooo much more at the link
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 658 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Threat of Tribalism (Original Post)
Roland99
Sep 2018
OP
erronis
(15,306 posts)1. Thanks. I'll take any link to The Atlantic over most others. Thoughtful and provoking.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)2. Bookmark thanks Roland99