General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo the ratpublicans have a binder full of women...again. 65 of them this time, who apparently
have such intimate knowledge of Kavanaughs character that they are able to testify that he is above reproach. Why am I suspicious? Gee, I dont know. Maybe the fact that this list appeared magically out thin air, fully and oddly in anticipation of allegations that Kavanaugh was a sexual pervert?
Did Kavanaugh date all 65 of these women? Spend time in their company, alone, in sexually wrought situations? Did they all say no? Did he respect that statement in all cases? Or did they all say yes?
These women are willing to put their name forward as character witnesses, they now need to testify in an open hearing. Ratpublicans have put these names forward, Democratic Senators have the right and obligation to ask questions of these women. It is due diligence and the right and proper thing to do.
Guilded Lilly
(5,591 posts)The pretext that the Republicans would miraculously, overnight, have 65 women with clear, ready and sterling opinions of Kavanaugh is an indication of just how deep the bullshit flows through their party.
Their agenda is pure anti-democracy.
leftstreet
(36,108 posts)DURec
eppur_se_muova
(36,263 posts)so how many women would know what he was like at that age ?
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)And I keep waiting for some investigative reporter to dig into this bullshit.