Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,313 posts)
Sun Sep 16, 2018, 10:49 AM Sep 2018

Notes on Watching TV Coverage of Storm Operations:

TV news crews are pretty much limited to the perimeter of storm-damaged areas. Their remote vehicles and equipment can't get deep into damaged areas.

So, we're not seeing the totality of what's going on in rescues and other operations. That's also why you see the same footage over and over again. Reporting is stretched thin.

We're seeing what's happening in places like Wilmington, NC, but not in the many, many small towns around the area. The roads to them are flooded, so the reporters can't get there.

It won't be until the flood water goes down that they'll be able to reach those areas. By then, though, there will be a new story to cover. That's why so many neighborhoods in New Orleans stayed damaged for so very long. They weren't on the news. Poor people lived there. We see what happens where things aren't so bad to keep reporters out. We don't see the places they can't go. Then, something else happens and the reporters are no longer there at all.

News coverage ends near the edges of disasters. That's all we see. You'll see the same street in Wilmington, NC again and again, because the news vans can drive to that location.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Notes on Watching TV Coverage of Storm Operations: (Original Post) MineralMan Sep 2018 OP
Having been through a flood mercuryblues Sep 2018 #1
NC is known for its hog waste ponds. roamer65 Sep 2018 #2
Yes, no doubt. But, again, the news vans MineralMan Sep 2018 #3
One of the reasons people don't get a clear picture of tsunami effects. Girard442 Sep 2018 #4
Yes, exactly. It's not the fault of the media, really. MineralMan Sep 2018 #5
I'd like to think some in the media endeavor to paint an accurate picture. Girard442 Sep 2018 #6
I'm sure that's true, within their capabilities. MineralMan Sep 2018 #7
Local NC TV is doing a very good job unc70 Sep 2018 #8

mercuryblues

(14,532 posts)
1. Having been through a flood
Sun Sep 16, 2018, 11:20 AM
Sep 2018

(I live on a hill so no damage to our area)

You are mostly correct. The local news will be covering it non-stop. They will be begging people to stay off the roads - hint they won't.
Not only that, many gawkers will move the cones to get through closed roads...then not put them back. People died from that. I repeat...stay off the roads, even if they look safe.


Earthen dams are the worst and first to go. If any dams are downstream it will be a domino effect. Because of this new flood maps will be drawn. Many people will be screwed because building codes will change in those areas. IOW they will not be able to repair their homes, even if they only sustained minimal damage,it will be too costly. Who can afford to raise their home 2 ft. to meet the new codes? Many of the homes in those areas do not have basements because of sandy soil.

The text alert system was excellent for reporting dam breaches, flooded and closed roads. Actually too good, people stopped paying attention to them and ended up flooded in need of rescue.


roamer65

(36,745 posts)
2. NC is known for its hog waste ponds.
Sun Sep 16, 2018, 11:26 AM
Sep 2018

Flood waters are gonna be horribly disease ridden.

Not to mention coal ash dumps.

MineralMan

(146,313 posts)
3. Yes, no doubt. But, again, the news vans
Sun Sep 16, 2018, 11:28 AM
Sep 2018

can't get to those ponds to record their collapse and drainage.

It won't be covered much in the news.

Girard442

(6,075 posts)
4. One of the reasons people don't get a clear picture of tsunami effects.
Sun Sep 16, 2018, 11:29 AM
Sep 2018

You don’t get any reporting from places where everybody died.

MineralMan

(146,313 posts)
5. Yes, exactly. It's not the fault of the media, really.
Sun Sep 16, 2018, 11:32 AM
Sep 2018

They can't get there, and by the time they can, the news has moved on to the next horror.

We often know or learn very little of what happens.

Girard442

(6,075 posts)
6. I'd like to think some in the media endeavor to paint an accurate picture.
Sun Sep 16, 2018, 11:37 AM
Sep 2018

Oops, looks like some optimism slipped out there.

MineralMan

(146,313 posts)
7. I'm sure that's true, within their capabilities.
Sun Sep 16, 2018, 11:38 AM
Sep 2018

The news media arrives and then moves on to the next story.

unc70

(6,114 posts)
8. Local NC TV is doing a very good job
Sun Sep 16, 2018, 02:11 PM
Sep 2018

Even the national cable news and weather stations are doing a better job. Yes, many of the reporters are on the periphery in places like Wilmington, but the eye came ashore on Wrightsville Beach just across the bridge from Wilmington proper. Because of new technologies, reporters can deliver live reports from most anywhere.

And they did. Day after day. From Swansboro, Hempstead, Jacksonville, Beaufort, Oak Island, and other places all around. Smartphones with cellular connections allow almost anyone to report.

Maybe because we in N.C. have serious storms on a regular basis, but the local media coverage have refined their skills and a their responses.

Now there is the shift to include coverage of the severe inland flooding. Nearly half of North Carolina is now flooded!

NC state and local government unfortunately has too much experience with these kinds of disasters. From that experience, everyone has learned and increased resources and procedures: water rescues, stronger building codes, etc.

BTW I suggest you try streaming one of the local TV stations like WRAL.com

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Notes on Watching TV Cove...