Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 09:10 PM Aug 2012

Montana Supreme Court allows anti-Citizens United referendum on Nov. ballot

Source: Missoulian

In separate rulings Friday, the Montana Supreme Court upheld a lower court ruling to strike a tax rebate referendum from the November ballot, but rejected an attempt to remove a campaign finance initiative.

... On the ballot: Initiative 166, a nonbinding policy statement that would direct the state’s congressional delegation to support an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to say that corporations aren’t people and money isn’t speech.

... As for I-166, the court decided, in a 6-1 vote, to allow it to remain on the ballot. McGrath, Cotter, Rice, Wheat, Morris and Baker were in the majority, while Nelson dissented.

... The court majority said the attorney general’s review is limited by law to determining whether the petition complies with statutory and constitutional requirements “governing submission of the proposed issue to the electors” but doesn’t include consideration of the “substantive legality of the issue, if approved by the voters.”

Read more: http://missoulian.com/news/local/montana-supreme-court-removes-tax-rebate-referendum-allows-corporate-personhood/article_3eca6b28-e32e-11e1-8f53-0019bb2963f4.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Montana Supreme Court allows anti-Citizens United referendum on Nov. ballot (Original Post) Newsjock Aug 2012 OP
Seems good. kick and rec. nt limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #1
That should be interesting. progressoid Aug 2012 #2
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Montana Supreme Court all...