General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYet Another Self-Inflicted Wound
When Republicans refused to disclose tens of thousands of documents pertaining to Kavanaughs past record, the obvious reaction of thinking people was a suspicion that there was something to hide and given the volume of documents that were refused to be disclosed, it seemed to confirm that there was A LOT of something to hide.
In the doing, the Republicans raised a red flag the size of a small state, which in turn caused Democrats to go into the confirmation process with more than a small amount of scepticism, wondering exactly what was being withheld and why.
Of course, Kavanaughs performance in Q and A sessions only served to cement the concept of things being hidden such as his own views, opinions, and positions on legal questions. His answers were so vague, so wandering, and often so unrelated to the questions posed, he could have picked a man off the street with no legal knowledge or experience whatsoever to be questioned in his stead. And that mans answers would probably have been more enlightening than Kavanaughs turned out to be.
Enter Professor Ford and her allegations and the inevitable thought that dots are being connected. Was this the reason or one of the reasons why the GOP was so blatantly reluctant to have Kavanaughs past fully vetted? Was this the reason or one of the reasons why the Republicans are so intent to rush through the confirmation process with as little scrutiny of the nominee as possible?
Needless to say, there may be no connection whatsoever. But its the actions of the GOP that have invited speculation and suspicion.
And then theres the biggest red flag in all of this: the letter signed by 65 women attesting to Kavanaughs good character when he was in high school a letter that miraculously appeared within days of Professor Fords allegations being made public.
There are only two possibilities as to how that letter of exoneration could have been produced in such a short period of time. One, someone was able to track down 65 women who knew Kavanaugh in his high school years within days or two, the list of potential signatories to such a letter was compiled long before Professor Fords accusations in anticipation of such an endorsement being required at some point in the future.
If youve ever tried to track down female schoolmates from decades ago, you know how difficult it is. Women marry and adopt their husbands surname, making it impossible to locate them without intensive, time-consuming investigation. The idea that anyone could instantly locate 65 females who knew Kavanaugh over thirty years ago not only strains credulity it literally laughs in the face of common sense.
And then theres the closing argument from Kavanaugh. While Professor Ford has stated that she doesnt remember when or where the party at which she was assaulted took place, Kavanaugh stated that he wasnt at that party. How can you possibly know that you werent in attendance at an event that hasnt even been specifically identified?
At this point, there isnt a single aspect of Kavanaughs nomination that doesnt stink, from Kennedys sudden retirement in light of the fact that he would have had to recuse himself from any case before him involving Trump, due to his sons connection with Trump via his position at Deutsche Bank to Kavanaughs opinions on virtually limitless presidential powers, to his carefully-crafted non-answers to very pointed questions during his confirmation hearing. Its a cloth woven of the same filthy threads and they are all emanating the same stench as theyre unravelled.
It all comes down to one indisputable fact. Trumps nomination of Kavanaugh was based solely on one thing: his position that the president is above the law. In choosing him as a SCOTUS candidate, all other considerations were irrelevant. And the fact that the Republicans are oh-so-anxious to have this particular nominee confirmed quickly is yet another example of how desperate they are to exonerate themselves for having elected a lying traitor to the Oval Office.
The Republicans have many skills lying, cheating, and enriching themselves at the expense of taxpayers, just to name just a few. But theyve now added a new talent to their repertoire: shooting themselves in the foot. Kavanaughs nomination and the necessity to withhold relevant documents about his past record is the proof thereof.
DFW
(54,403 posts)Nixon's G. Harrold Carswell, Reagan's Robert Bork. A complete hack, an extremist, and now a corrupt get-out-of-jail-free card disguised as a jurist (who may yet get in if the media is paid enough to dampen the furor).
They got away with it with Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, and Sam Alito isn't much better. Compare these questionable appointments to solid legal minds such as Steve Breyer, RBG, Sonya Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. The quality and integrity of nominees to the Supreme Court should not be in question, even before the hearings begin. Kavanaugh was recognized as an unqualified hack within hours of his name being revealed.
Is there a pattern emerging here? No. The pattern is not emerging. It has been in place for decades.
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)Frequency Kenneth
(78 posts)Republicans did NOT expect what they ended up with. Even more true for Ike with Earl Warren!
DFW
(54,403 posts)Souter turned out to be fair and decent. Clarence Thomas was only nominated because he wanted to replace an AA (Thurgood Marshall) with another, and didn't much care about anything else. He had nominated Thomas to the D.C. Court of Appeals, so he didn't have to do a big search to find a black replacement for Marshall. Unfortunately his choice was a disastrous one for the country as a whole.
proglib217
(88 posts)Nominated by shrub, arguably the most unqualified nominee for a seat on the Court EVER.
DFW
(54,403 posts)W was just throwing her a bone
thucythucy
(8,069 posts)was succeeded by Clarence Thomas.
Ugh.
DFW
(54,403 posts)Not to mention the rest of us
BigmanPigman
(51,608 posts)told tRump to pick anyone else on the possible justice list except Kavanaugh. This could be due to what they already knew about his gambling problems and his past crimes related to women (there may be another victim too). McConnell says that getting Gorsuch was the highest point of his career as Senate leader. He is scum...he told Obama to select Garland when Obama asked who he would like (thinking this strategy would get a bipartisan justice). McConnell played him. As soon as he could he changed the rules and said no nominations to the court during the entire election year. McConnell knew Hillary would lose...why was he so confident!? Did he know something?
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)What made the Republicans so confident that if they obstructed Obama's pick for SCOTUS, they would wind up with their own choice eventually being appointed?
Surely they knew that if HRC was elected, she might nominate someone for SCOTUS that they hated even more than Garland. So why put off the nomination of Garland when someone who would have been even more opposed to the GOP agenda might be nominated - unless it was a "given" that Hillary would never be in a position to nominate anyone?
Just another one of those things that make you go Hmmmm ...
bdamomma
(63,868 posts)He knew all about the Russian hacking too before the election. He was awfully quiet during the Access Hollywood tape when it came out. I hate these fucking ole white men. Oops Ryan too, he's not old but needs to be included. We should be out in the streets ver this crap... ...sigh
BigmanPigman
(51,608 posts)Having a Women's March this weekend would be helpful too.
thbobby
(1,474 posts)I would like to say great minds think alike, but it is more likely that as I continue reading your posts, I continue to be educated. The gop is a criminal organization. I believe they protect trump because they are also complicit in election fraud and using foreign organized crime donations in their quest for power.
LittleGirl
(8,287 posts)The idea that anyone could instantly locate 65 females who knew Kavanaugh over thirty years ago not only strains credulity it literally laughs in the face of common sense.
It was queued up and ready for the hit because of course!
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)
as the eventual left.
It was a reference to older Florida drivers penchant for activating their left-hand turn-signal at least fifteen minutes before they had to make that turn. Ergo, the eventual left not immediately imminent, but prepared-for well ahead of time because its anticipated.
The question here is: Why was the GOP already queued-up to engage the eventual left turn-signal long before they allegedly knew that a turn was up ahead?
LittleGirl
(8,287 posts)But they have had this letter since July so I would imagine that it came up in the committee meeting so the GOPers jumped at the chance to get those signatures in anticipation. I wonder if the media will bother to track any of these women down and interview them too. The GOP are thick as thieves, those bastards.
Always a fan Nance.
thucythucy
(8,069 posts)Hasn't there already been a report that at least one signatory of a letter of support now says he signed no such letter?
Add to the absurdity of it all that Kavanaugh went to an all boys school. So these women weren't even classmates. But they all knew him well enough to swear he'd never been a rapist.
Which brings up another sore point for me--the idea that you can tell a rapist by looking at him or "knowing" him. Orrin Hatch saying he knows Kavanaugh and so can't believe the allegation. Didn't Hatch say the same thing about Rob Porter?
And think of all the nice things people said about Hastert, before he was convicted of raping children.
If rapists were all so easily identifiable, it would be so much easier to avoid them.
catrose
(5,068 posts)The others couldn't be found or wouldn't comment. Sorry, no link. It's been a hard day.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)LostinRed
(840 posts)Your commentary
True Blue American
(17,985 posts)Going to counter this list? 3 times their 65 and still adding on.
http://dcist.com/2018/09/more_than_200_holton_alums_sign_let.php
Tom Rinaldo
(22,913 posts)The coverup falls apart as soon as it is examined. I wondered also how he could claim not to have been present at a party that has not been specifically identified. Not possible. But even were he somehow to have gotten "inside information" (which to my knowledge has never been revealed) about what party was being referenced - the man/boy was a known heavy binge drinker, and he was described as being stinking drunk. That type of drinking induces black outs and total memory losses of everything that may have happened while drinking. His own "memory" is an "unreliable witness" at best.
I guess it just would have sounded too god damn guilty for him to use the obvious "I have no recollection" standard ploy as his defense.
malaise
(269,037 posts)K & R
sheshe2
(83,785 posts)She is Britt Humes daughter. I posted the rest here.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211144869
Link to tweet
They are all dirty.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)She stated that there was a 3rd person in the room
No one who was making up a story would put a friend of the attacker in the room in a position to discredit her account.
How do Republicans respond to that?
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)Sparkly
(24,149 posts)To add another wrinkle.
Just sayin'.
Kath2
(3,074 posts)Agree 100%.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,349 posts)Thanks for another excellent read, NanceGreggs!
The props Kavanaugh used now seem to have been in anticipation of a #metoo moment. Has any other nominee had uniformed girls lined up in the background during a hearing?
BlueHusker
(4 posts)Your posts are amazing. Always informative, thoughtful and on point. The wit and style ain't bad either! Thanks for sharing and even more thanks for being on our side.