General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump can't use FEMA's wireless alerts to send personal messages -- it's illegal
Trump can't use FEMA's wireless alerts to send personal messages it's illegal
Public concern around privacy and abuse of power is offset by legislation put into place to deter any president from mishandling the alert system.
by Farnoush Amiri / Sep.18.2018 / 5:01 PM ET
Contrary to public concern, the Federal Emergency Management Agency is not handing President Donald Trump a direct line to send personalized messages to American citizens.
He would be breaking the law if he did.
Last Friday, the Federal Communications Commission and FEMA announced plans to test a system that would allow the president to send a message to mobile devices across the U.S.
The announcement of the Wireless Emergency Alert (WEA) test caused some concerns that it could be used by Trump like he uses Twitter. But in 2015, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., introduced a bill to prevent any president from abusing the system.
"Except to the extent necessary for testing the public alert and warning system, the public alert and warning system shall not be used to transmit a message that does not relate to a natural disaster, act of terrorism, or other man-made disaster or threat to public safety, " states the Integrated Public Alert and Warning System Modernization Act of 2015.
This means that Trump will not be allowed to send messages related to the ongoing investigation into Russia's attempts to influence the 2016 U.S. election or about the midterm elections in November.
snip//
News of the test spurred an online backlash and a flood of calls to FEMA, which has been inundated with requests to opt out of the alert hampering the agency's ongoing emergency response to Hurricane Florence, FEMA spokesperson Jenny Burke told NBC News.
more...
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/trump-can-t-use-fema-s-wireless-alerts-send-personal-n910676?cid=sm_npd_nn_fb_ma
SimpleC
(279 posts)does trump respect something as trivial as laws?...
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Last edited Tue Sep 18, 2018, 09:11 PM - Edit history (1)
It's not like the Congress will hold him accountable.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)I wonder where all the Jade Helm alarmists have gone to? Boy, didn't they raise a stink about their fever dream of being rounded up and imprisoned in abandoned Wal Marts? Or the folks who were so bent out of shape about President Obama's proposed start-of-school message to students about being good citizens and studying hard in class? I haven't heard a peep out of those people concerning this.
By the way, what's the penalty for transmitting a message that does not relate to a natural disaster, act of terrorism, or other man-made disaster or threat to public safety? I checked the text of the law, and it doesn't specify a fine, jail time or any other punishment for violating the law.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)We have an alert system. There is no reason for Trump to be a part of this AT ALL. I can see no benefit to this and plenty of potential for abuse. In his hands, it could also be incredibly dangerous if he were to use it to announce phony terror attacks or nuclear threats from our "enemies" - or more likely, his enemies.
This is just a bad idea all the way around. There is no logical reason for him to have this capability.
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)Kajun Gal
(1,907 posts)SWBTATTReg
(22,124 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,928 posts)any time he talks it is an act of terrorism?
he is a man-made disaster?
he is a threat to public safety?
Bettie
(16,109 posts)as if that has ever stopped that creature from doing anything he wants to.
Kaleva
(36,301 posts)dalton99a
(81,489 posts)Traditions and norms are important to him