Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKavanaugh Bears the Burden of Proof
Kavanaugh Bears the Burden of Proof
The question isnt whether he can win confirmationits whether he can defend against the charge he faces in a manner that is both persuasive and honorable.
2:55 PM ET
Benjamin Wittes
Editor in chief of Lawfare and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution
The manner in which Senate Republicans and Brett Kavanaughs supposed allies are championing the judges innocence should sting as the ultimate humiliation. They apparently dont have sufficient confidence in the nominee to let a routine investigation take place before holding a hearing. They apparently dont believe in him enough to make minor accommodations on the date of a hearing to a woman who is receiving death threats. They are publicly floating theories naming an alternative perpetratorand then removing them and apologizing after those theories are picked up by Fox & Friends. Having held up Merrick Garlands nomination for the better part of a year to get past one election, they are apparently so fearful of further erosion of support for their nominee that they feel the need to rush this matter to a vote just weeks before another one. In the era of #MeToo, their actions bespeak the fear of et tu. Their solution is hasteand not the sort of haste that suggests faith. It is the sort of haste that that has one eye on the midterms and the other eye cast downward.
I have known Brett Kavanaugh for a long timein many different contexts. I am fond of him personally. I think the world of him intellectually. I dont believe he lied in his Senate testimony. I dont believe hes itching to get on the Supreme Court to protect Donald Trump from Robert Mueller. Im much less afraid of conservative judges than are many of my liberal friends. As recently as a few days ago, I was cheerfully vouching for Kavanaughs character.
That said, the allegation against him is, at least so far as one can tell from the press reports, credible, and it deserves to be taken seriously.
If Kavanaugh were to ask my advice todayand to be clear, he hasnt done soI would tell him he almost certainly should have his nomination withdrawn. The circumstances in which he should fight this out are, in my view, extremely limited. I would advise him against letting Senate Republicans ram his nomination through in a fashion that will forever attach an asterisk to his service on the Supreme Court. Assuming she is not impugning him maliciously, Kavanaughs accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, deserves better than that. The Court deserves better than that. And Kavanaugh himself, if he is telling the truth about his conduct in high school, deserves better than to be confirmed under circumstances which tens of millions of people will regard, with good reason, as tainted.
Lets start with a blunt reality: The sum of the allegations against Kavanaugh is, if true, disqualifying. On both left and right, commentators have suggested that the assault allegation alone is not grounds for Kavanaughs rejectioneven if true. Lets leave for another day the question of whether thats right. The allegation does not present on its own. Kavanaugh has categorically denied the incident took place. That means that if it did take place, he is either lying about it now or, short of that, perhaps has no memory of the matter. The former is certainly disqualifying. The latter, even if Kavanaughs memory is genuinely and honestly impaired and he actually believes the incident never took place, cannot be distinguished publicly from the former. Though Kavanaugh has been careful not to slime Ford, his denial of the incident impugns her anyway, which is legitimate if his denial is accurate. It will not do, however, to impeach her credibility wrongly and then ask for confirmation to the highest court in the land because the false denial was not intentionally false. If the allegations are true, Kavanaugh cannot be confirmed.
more...
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/09/kavanaugh-confirmation/571021/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 921 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kavanaugh Bears the Burden of Proof (Original Post)
babylonsister
Sep 2018
OP
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,472 posts)1. the logic -- it burns
It is good to read a logical, coherent, law-based argument in the middle of a political sham.
dlk
(11,580 posts)2. Attempted Rape is a Felony