Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,183 posts)
Sun Sep 23, 2018, 11:33 PM Sep 2018

Grassley: Dems 'withheld information' on new Kavanaugh allegation

A spokesperson for Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) on Sunday night said the panel will "attempt to evaluate" new allegations of sexual assault regarding Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

The spokesperson in a statement slammed Democrats for "withholding information" regarding the allegations.

"Yet again, Senate Democrats actively withheld information from the rest of the Committee only to drop information at politically opportune moments," the statement said, doubling down on his remarks that Democrats withheld the first allegation against Kavanaugh from Christine Blasey Ford, who went public last week.

The spokesperson said the Democrats appear to be "more interested in a political takedown" than "pursuing allegations through a bipartisan and professional" investigation.

https://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/408033-grassley-panel-will-attempt-to-evaluate-new-kavanaugh-allegations

Methinks thou dothe protest too much GrASSley. How many thousands of pages of documantation on Kavanaugh has your shitty party withheld?

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Grassley: Dems 'withheld information' on new Kavanaugh allegation (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 2018 OP
Bullshit. triron Sep 2018 #1
NYT reporting that Trump knew about the second allegation last week! bettyellen Sep 2018 #2
Grassley knew. That was why he was rushing the confirmation. Freethinker65 Sep 2018 #3
Yeah...and if they did? So Fucking what....how many things have the GOP hidden? Pachamama Sep 2018 #4
Republicans are withholding 100,000 pages of documentation on Kavanaugh from ... Snake Plissken Sep 2018 #5
The New Yorker article contradicts this Kaleva Sep 2018 #6
Exactly. Thanks for posting. nt SunSeeker Sep 2018 #14
So the repubes are lying Achilleaze Sep 2018 #22
prepare to be Rip Van Winkle mnmoderatedem Sep 2018 #24
The "P" in "GOP" stands for Projection dalton99a Sep 2018 #7
Fuck You, Chuck. madaboutharry Sep 2018 #8
BS - if they wanted "a bipartisan and professional investigation" Jarqui Sep 2018 #9
Dems 'withheld information' Botany Sep 2018 #10
Exactly dalton99a Sep 2018 #13
Like 90 percent of his written record Achilleaze Sep 2018 #23
Hooray and Hallelujah! Ya had it comin' to ya! raging moderate Sep 2018 #11
The Republicans knew about the Farrow-Mayer article and the Ramirez accusation last week. tblue37 Sep 2018 #12
What about the gang rapes, Chuck? torius Sep 2018 #15
Munch on it, Grassley C_U_L8R Sep 2018 #16
Pure projection. Scurrilous Sep 2018 #17
Like they did with the DNC emails. joshcryer Sep 2018 #18
How about you choke on an extra-large bag of dicks, Chuck? flibbitygiblets Sep 2018 #19
... so, a "bimbo eruption" Qutzupalotl Sep 2018 #20
The lack of self-awareness shanny Sep 2018 #21

Snake Plissken

(4,103 posts)
5. Republicans are withholding 100,000 pages of documentation on Kavanaugh from ...
Sun Sep 23, 2018, 11:36 PM
Sep 2018

the Senate and the American people and senile Grassley is complaining about information being withheld from him ... priceless.

Kaleva

(36,340 posts)
6. The New Yorker article contradicts this
Sun Sep 23, 2018, 11:36 PM
Sep 2018

"Senior Republican staffers also learned of the allegation last week and, in conversations with The New Yorker, expressed concern about its potential impact on Kavanaugh’s nomination. Soon after, Senate Republicans issued renewed calls to accelerate the timing of a committee vote."

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez

madaboutharry

(40,219 posts)
8. Fuck You, Chuck.
Sun Sep 23, 2018, 11:37 PM
Sep 2018

That dog won’t hunt.

Whining about when you got what is not relevant.

The only thing that matters is your manic rush to install a sexual predator and degenerate on the Supreme Court.

Jarqui

(10,130 posts)
9. BS - if they wanted "a bipartisan and professional investigation"
Sun Sep 23, 2018, 11:37 PM
Sep 2018

all they had to do was call in the FBI ...

But they knew the FBI would find the sex assault skeletons in Kavanaugh's closet.

So they cut off any witnesses and pressed for a quick review.

They knew all along.

Botany

(70,577 posts)
10. Dems 'withheld information'
Sun Sep 23, 2018, 11:37 PM
Sep 2018


Gee, I seem to remember that the Senate Republicans withholding lots of information on Kavanaugh
from the Democratic Senators and their staffs on the Senate Judiciary committee.

raging moderate

(4,308 posts)
11. Hooray and Hallelujah! Ya had it comin' to ya!
Sun Sep 23, 2018, 11:38 PM
Sep 2018

Republicons think it is perfectly okay for them to violate the United States Constitution, as they did when they refused to give their advice and consent to Obama's US Constitution-mandated Supreme Court appointment Merrick Garland ("The President SHALL APPOINT..."ETC.). Everybody else, however, is supposedly required by God to tiptoe around scrupulously respecting GOP feelings and desires.

tblue37

(65,483 posts)
12. The Republicans knew about the Farrow-Mayer article and the Ramirez accusation last week.
Sun Sep 23, 2018, 11:38 PM
Sep 2018

That's precisely why they were rushing those arbitrary deadlines. They were hoping to confirm him before it all came out.

Accusing the Dems of withholding information is almost as ironic as Mitch McConnell being outraged that the Dems wouldn't, as he claims, give the president's SCOTUS nominee a quick and fair confirmation process.

Qutzupalotl

(14,325 posts)
20. ... so, a "bimbo eruption"
Mon Sep 24, 2018, 12:03 AM
Sep 2018

from the pasty-faced persecutor of the Clintons, which focused undue attention on their sex life.

This guy hates the Clintons for what he cannot accept about himself. He doesn’t need a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court. He needs regular appointments with a therapist.

 

shanny

(6,709 posts)
21. The lack of self-awareness
Mon Sep 24, 2018, 07:55 AM
Sep 2018

coupled with weapons grade hypocrisy is pathetic. Is the entire party afflicted with senility or something? Don't they know how they sound?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Grassley: Dems 'withheld ...