Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,071 posts)
Sun Sep 30, 2018, 04:12 PM Sep 2018

House Dem: Kavanaugh would have to recuse himself from cases involving congressional Democrats

Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Sunday that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh's testimony in which he lashed out at Democrats should disqualify his nomination.

Nadler, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, said on ABC's "This Week" that if Kavanaugh were confirmed to the Supreme Court, the "proper thing" would be for the judge to recuse himself from cases involving congressional Democrats.

"On the one hand, the hearing was inspiring," Nadler said. "I was really inspired to see Dr. [Christine] Blasey Ford have the courage and the fortitude to go through what she did, to bring forth these charges, to tell what happened to her in a very credible way."

Nadler said he was "astonished" at Kavanaugh's testimony, arguing that the judge needed to be nonpartisan, regardless of whether he felt he's been falsely accused.

"His evident animus toward the entire Democratic party, toward people associated with it, like the Clintons, should be disqualifying," Nadler said. "He showed no judicial temperament."

https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/409127-house-dem-kavanaugh-would-have-to-recuse-himself-from-cases

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House Dem: Kavanaugh would have to recuse himself from cases involving congressional Democrats (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 2018 OP
And cases involving women. Squinch Sep 2018 #1
And anything involving women . . . . Iliyah Sep 2018 #2
And anything involving beer. diva77 Sep 2018 #3
Ha!! Would those be cases about beer or cases of beer? dameatball Sep 2018 #9
He's going to make us pay. As he said. Nt BootinUp Sep 2018 #4
That's impeachable. Iliyah Sep 2018 #5
+1. To me that was worse than his anger. Hoyt Sep 2018 #6
He won't, and there is no law that says he has to still_one Sep 2018 #7
True, but not recusing oneself from cases where ethically one should... Salviati Sep 2018 #8
I will hold back from laughing, but there is nothing too indicate ehical behavior in these people still_one Sep 2018 #10
We're waking up. ffr Sep 2018 #11
He's NOT Going To Recuse Himself From Shit LandOfHopeAndDreams Sep 2018 #12

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
2. And anything involving women . . . .
Sun Sep 30, 2018, 04:17 PM
Sep 2018

Nevertheless, hopefully he won't get in. Sham FBI investigation. But alas, Flake, Collins and Murkowski don't seriously care, they just wanted some type of cover.

The sane citizens of the USA know the truth.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
6. +1. To me that was worse than his anger.
Sun Sep 30, 2018, 04:32 PM
Sep 2018

His anger didn’t surprise me. I would expect anger if he was innocent (not very likely), or he realized after all these years he’s going to have to pay for his crimes when he’s close to the pinnacle of his career. I think the latter is most likely, and I’m glad he’s in pain.

Can an appellant to SC — like Democrats or women — request a recusal?

Salviati

(6,008 posts)
8. True, but not recusing oneself from cases where ethically one should...
Sun Sep 30, 2018, 04:41 PM
Sep 2018

... is not an example of good Behaviour.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»House Dem: Kavanaugh woul...