Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,705 posts)
Mon Oct 1, 2018, 07:08 PM Oct 2018

Witness tampering?

In the days leading up to a public allegation that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh exposed himself to a college classmate, the judge and his team were communicating behind the scenes with friends to refute the claim, according to text messages obtained by NBC News.

Kerry Berchem, who was at Yale with both Kavanaugh and his accuser, Deborah Ramirez, has tried to get those messages to the FBI for its newly reopened investigation into the matter but says she has yet to be contacted by the bureau.

The texts between Berchem and Karen Yarasavage, both friends of Kavanaugh, suggest that the nominee was personally talking with former classmates about Ramirez’s story in advance of the New Yorker article that made her allegation public. In one message, Yarasavage said Kavanaugh asked her to go on the record in his defense. Two other messages show communication between Kavanaugh's team and former classmates in advance of the story.

The texts also demonstrate that Kavanaugh and Ramirez were more socially connected than previously understood and that Ramirez was uncomfortable around Kavanaugh when they saw each other at a wedding 10 years after they graduated. Berchem's efforts also show that some potential witnesses have been unable to get important information to the FBI.


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/mutual-friend-ramirez-kavanaugh-anxious-come-forward-evidence-n915566
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Witness tampering? (Original Post) The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 OP
Since it's not a criminal trial, it probably wouldn't stick... Wounded Bear Oct 2018 #1
Exactly my thought. If it was a criminal trial, Still In Wisconsin Oct 2018 #2
This is a background check for a job interview there are no "witnessess" Fullduplexxx Oct 2018 #3
No. onenote Oct 2018 #4
YES IT IS. BumRushDaShow Oct 2018 #5

Wounded Bear

(58,656 posts)
1. Since it's not a criminal trial, it probably wouldn't stick...
Mon Oct 1, 2018, 07:12 PM
Oct 2018

but it should definitely be exposed and shouted from the rooftops in the press.

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
2. Exactly my thought. If it was a criminal trial,
Mon Oct 1, 2018, 07:19 PM
Oct 2018

this would be tampering. But since it's not, this is just exhibit # 2,196 in the case against Rapey Brett ever being on SCOTUS.

BumRushDaShow

(129,021 posts)
5. YES IT IS.
Mon Oct 1, 2018, 08:30 PM
Oct 2018

Tweety CONFIRMED just before his show ended. I looked it up!

I.e., the hearings are considered "proceedings".

1729. Protection Of Government Processes -- Tampering With Victims, Witnesses, Or Informants -- 18 U.S.C. 1512

Section 1512 of Title 18 constitutes a broad prohibition against tampering with a witness, victim or informant. It proscribes conduct intended to illegitimately affect the presentation of evidence in Federal proceedings or the communication of information to Federal law enforcement officers. It applies to proceedings before Congress, executive departments, and administrative agencies, and to civil and criminal judicial proceedings, including grand jury proceedings. See 18 U.S.C. § 1515(a)(1). In addition, the section provides extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over the offenses created therein. See 18 U.S.C. § 1512(g); 128 Cong. Rec. H8469 (daily ed. Oct. 1, 1980); H. R. Rep. No. 1369, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. 20-22 (1980).

https://www.justice.gov/jm/criminal-resource-manual-1729-protection-government-processes-tampering-victims-witnesses-or


https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1512
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Witness tampering?