General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAmazon is raising its minimum wage to $15 following pressure from Bernie Sanders
Isobel Asher Hamilton 26m
Excerpt:
Amazon has announced it is raising its minimum wage in the US to $15, following sustained pressure from Democratic Senator Bernie Sanders.
In a statement released on Tuesday, Amazon said the salary increase, which is more than double the federal minimum wage of $7.25, will come into effect on November 1. It will impact more than 250,000 Amazon employees, plus more than 100,000 seasonal staff who work for Amazon over the holiday season.
"We listened to our critics, thought hard about what we wanted to do, and decided we want to lead," said CEO Jeff Bezos. "We're excited about this change and encourage our competitors and other large employers to join us."
This decision follows sustained pressure from Senator Bernie Sanders, who has attacked Amazon for how little it pays its workers, and introduced a bill in September entitled "Stop BEZOS," which would tax large companies whose low-wage employees rely on government assistance.
https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-raises-minimum-wage-to-15-dollars-2018-10
mythology
(9,527 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)created a tightening labor market combined with high profits that created increased demand for labor and the ability to pay for it.
Let's give him a huge round for both of those! Why didn't he do it 20 years ago, though?
The tightening labor market is largely the result of 8 years of the Obama recovery. Bernie had a huge role in this though as he had been calling out Bezos non stop. Wage growth in the US is still slow and thanks to Trump inflation is now beating its growth. Any wage growth we have seen though is the result of the labor movement demanding a higher floor.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)shouldn't we also credit all the other senators and congressmen who have been working on business, of course for some of them including Amazon, to raise wages?
Unlike Sanders. I can't find any of his pressure before late summer 2018, AFTER many businesses were already raising wages, labor crunch was occurring, and many more were expected. Where was his effort in 2017? Why wait until it was going to happen anyway to launch this "crusade"?
I shrugged before but am getting angry thinking about it. Besides rewarding grandstanding so outrageously, it's not only profoundly dishonest but demoralizing for people like this author to pretend that not only did the short- and long-term efforts of hundreds of others have no effect but don't even exist. A number of Democrats have good relationships with Bezos, which can hardly be said of Sanders, and we know what they say about honey and vinegar.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)And companies, plenty of companies have always had the ability to pay better wages. They've just seen no reason to.
Also, it makes absolutley no sense that 20 years ago Sanders could have had the kind of impact that he has today, given that he's a household name now. Why would anybody give a shit if they could just ignore him and have their media do the same?
Bengus81
(6,932 posts)Hell...it's what these Corporations are SUPPOSED to be doing with that FAT 14% tax cut.
FSogol
(45,524 posts)Awesome news!
qwlauren35
(6,150 posts)that this includes all temps...
right?
Donkees
(31,450 posts)OliverQ
(3,363 posts)which will boost his approval.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)win from Republican control and big tax breaks, deregulations etc. Maybe they want that perception.
Javaman
(62,533 posts)Last edited Tue Oct 2, 2018, 10:05 AM - Edit history (1)
many a long time employee who have "maxed out" the hourly rate and haven't had a raise in years, won't see a dime in a raise.
Le Gaucher
(1,547 posts)Make Amazon Give Away ( its profit)
Omaha Steve
(99,703 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(26,335 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Bitter about what?
My amusement at the writer's obvious mistake indicates bitterness?
Seriously? YGBSM! GMAFB!
George II
(67,782 posts)....will you explain it please?
TIA.
Cuthbert Allgood
(4,961 posts)Seems pretty self-explanatory.
George II
(67,782 posts)Cuthbert Allgood
(4,961 posts)There is much to be said through going through the process of figuring something out. "Give a man a fish..." and all that.
I'm quite sure you have the skills to cipher it out.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Response to George II (Reply #16)
Post removed
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Though the steak is a little salty as well...
Gothmog
(145,496 posts)The new DNC rule will require this change if sanders runs in 2020
In addition, sanders will have to release tax returns to get on the ballot in several states
mucifer
(23,560 posts)results should matter.
George II
(67,782 posts)mucifer
(23,560 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Tiggeroshii
(11,088 posts)Tjat would be my guess anyways
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Here are some quotes of his over the years....
1985:
I am not now, nor have I ever been, a liberal Democrat, he said in a profile in New England Monthly.
1986:
In that summers issue of Vermont Affairs magazine, he called the Democratic Party ideologically bankrupt, then added: They have no ideology. Their ideology is opportunism.
1989
1990:
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/bernie-sanders-2016-democrats-121181
June 2017
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jun/11/bernie-sanders-lambasts-absolute-failure-of-democratic-partys-strategy
Last April...
The business model, if you like, of the Democratic Party for the last 15 years or so has been a failure, Sanders said, according to The Washington Examiner.
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/381808-sanders-dem-platform-for-last-15-years-has-been-a-failure
JCanete
(5,272 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)USALiberal
(10,877 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)WeekiWater
(3,259 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)...that wouldn't be the only factual error in the Business Insider article.
I guess I would believe that conclusion if Amazon tells us that Sanders threatened to stop selling his books and paraphernalia on Amazon's website.
Did that happen?
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)And credit is where it is due.
But really Amazon is going to own the entire planet.
And the jobs are going away.
For every productivity advancement Amazon makes they probably get rid of two jobs. They are automating everything.
Of course we won't hear calls for a basic income (or a negative income tax) because that's too commie.
George II
(67,782 posts)Target by 2020
Walmart increased theirs recently, is looking at a further increase to $15
Plus several governments (Seattle, NYS, etc.) have announced increases to $15
Finally, it's in the 2016 Democratic Party Platform.
No one person or entity is responsible for any of this.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)I just don't think we should dismiss Sanders' efforts even though his proposed law was asinine (punishing / shaming people on assistance).
Most major west coast cities already have local wage laws on the books, too, and their efforts shouldn't be dismissed because it's a locality-based thing.
Sanders does get too much credit though, which I understand where you're coming from.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)out regularly on TV. Given that Sanders literally has a BEZOS act that he's promoting(and Walmart is also mentioned regularly), and given that minimum wage hikes at least on the local and state level are probably inevitable anyway, this is likely a good way to attempt to undercut that criticism.
Walmart is also not simply doing it out of the kindness of its heart. It is a response to the same kind of pressure. What is sitting on the internet from 2016 that nobody is reading anymore is pretty irrelevant to this whole thing though. Whichever Senators who are out there putting these companies in the cross-hairs for their hoarding of wealth and exploitation of their workforce, absolutely deserve credit, but it helps to actually name the biggest most influential offenders if you want to force their hand.
George II
(67,782 posts)Our state and local candidates are running on many of the planks of the CURRENT Democratic Party platform, not the least of which is our Democratic Party candidate for Governor, Ned Lamont. One of the things he's been campaigning for is a $15 minimum wage.
Here's a poster we waved at the State Convention back in May, see what's at the very top?
JCanete
(5,272 posts)What matters is what our politicians are running on and advocating for right now. Which is what Lamont is doing and what you guys were promoting at the convention, so kudos.
To be clear, I don't mean to suggest that it didn't matter that that was our platform. That was huge. That it has coat-tails is a big deal. Of course 15 dollar minimum wage was part of our platform in large part because of the concessions made going into the convention...so that kind of did have something to do with Sanders candidacy, which oddly enough is the kind of credit you seem to be keen on withholding.
George II
(67,782 posts)Aside from that, a number of municipalities and state governments have implemented rules/laws that have increased the minimum wage of employees within their jurisdiction, long before the so-called "Bezos" act was conceived.
NYS now has a law that went into effect almost two years, incrementally increasing the minimum wage in the state up to $15 an hour:
https://www.ny.gov/new-york-states-minimum-wage/new-york-states-minimum-wage
This affects hundreds of Amazon employees in New York State (and they're currently negotiating a new distribution center in the Albany area)
Seattle has increased their minimum wage for a number of businesses to $15 or more.
There are others who either have implemented increases or are planning to do so.
Both Target and Walmart have increased their minimum wage (Target already at $15, Walmart will follow). Amazon's decision is more a reaction to these developments than anything else.
Increasing the minimum wage isn't the brainchild of any particular person or even organization, it's a trend moving across the country.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)As to why Amazon is doing this, I agree with you. I don't know that they would have made this move had they not also seen a need to push back against bad pr, but if they hadn't already seen the writing on the wall, I'm certain that they and all the others who had already made this move would not have done so. But as to this being a reaction to other company decisions, I very much doubt any of these companies were "proactively" raising their pay level, nor were they doing it to compete for employees. That would be a matter of locally setting wages, rather than company wide.
R B Garr
(16,975 posts)was other politicians who did that. You would think Vermont would be leading the way, but, no.
Cuthbert Allgood
(4,961 posts)So it could be because of Sanders.
Donkees
(31,450 posts)bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)recognize the hard work and beauty of all these people, please! The movement!!!!!!
Fight For 15Verified account
@fightfor15
International movement of underpaid workers taking a stand against poverty wages. We are winning, join us.
https://twitter.com/fightfor15
Donkees
(31,450 posts)joshcryer
(62,276 posts)This is just kicking the can down the road.
Basic income is necessary.
BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)Workers/labors rights and he would rather short cut that as best he can for now by throwing money at it. Yesterday the Guardian had a great article on how his ownership is having a terrible impact on Whole Foods. The workers are looking at forming a union. To a guy like Bezos that could become a scary adversary. Right now he can control the bleeding, or so he thinks.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)This is a PR move because when he winds up firing / relocating every Whole Foods employee to have his vision of a nearly fully automated store, it'll soften the blow. "But everyone gets $15! That's twice minimum wage!"
Nevermind to keep up with inflation the minimum wage needs to be $20 or more (one thing I didn't like about the $15 figure).
BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)is so critical. Have you seen the insane view of Trump recently on climate change? Its getting hotter but don't bother to address it, too late! They are so blinded by their greed they seem to believe they and their children can be sheltered from it. California and Arizona are expected to get unprecedented rain this week, just to name two alarming forecasts.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)It's only a matter of time. If they don't someone else will make it. It's just the only economically feasible and desirable thing.
On one hand I think it is a good thing, because I don't think workers should be on their feet 8 hours a day making food for people, but on the other hand that's a lot of jobs that are just going to be gone. Gone. Forever.
It's scary.
Climate change is just the tip of the iceberg. The Colorado River is undergoing a massive decline as the watershed is being depleted. AZ, NV, and CA are all going to be screwed (there's a recent post in Environment and Energy about Lake Mead entering a new norm where it's 36% under its normal level).
David__77
(23,484 posts)Automation can increase aggregate wealth, providing the economic foundation for basic income. Basic income would create social stability. I think that, as time goes on, the political interests of some large corporations and "small business" will increasingly diverge on this and other matters.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)But the air will be clean.
Amazon and a few other companies will dominate the world's production. They could give out a stipend to people living in their factory cities, etc. Talking 50+ years here.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)Thank you for posting that!
Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)melman
(7,681 posts)As I recall, Sen. Sanders caught a lot of flack from certain people over his comments on Amazon.
Perhaps this is (further) proof those people don't know what the eff they're talking about.
R B Garr
(16,975 posts)they actually said or if you refuse to accept what they said. It had to do with the hypocrisy of calling out Amazon while still utilizing their services himself. His books are on Amazon and he sells and profits from his affiliation with Amazon. This is not difficult to remember.
edit; it wasn't "over his comments on Amazon" LOL
melman
(7,681 posts)I remember perfectly well, thanks. No need to take my word for it though, because a quick look at past threads on this topic will show quite conclusively who it is that's misremembering. Spoiler: It's not me.
R B Garr
(16,975 posts)and you substituted your version of lame personal insults in place of the hypocrisy noted of complaining about Amazon but still using them for personal benefit. Either misremembering or deliberately distorting was a fail.
edit: here's the link to Bernie's book on AMAZON
https://www.amazon.com/Bernie-Sanders-Guide-Political-Revolution/dp/1250138906/ref=pd_lpo_sbs_14_t_0?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=FJ7PM3C009R9S2B84GK1
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211222023
George II
(67,782 posts)SixString
(1,057 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(26,335 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)Donkees
(31,450 posts)Donkees
(31,450 posts)DangerousRhythm
(2,916 posts)It's been big news in the WFM universe and I suspect they would do anything to quell the anger of workers who are stretched super thin, doing the jobs of 3 or 4 different people with less hours. Not to mention all the bad press of Amazon workers having to wear diapers because they can't even get bathroom breaks.
Just my opinion, though.
See their complaints here:
https://www.thelayoff.com/amazon-com
https://www.thelayoff.com/whole-foods-market